In what can only be described as a reckless threat to public health, former CNN journalist John Davidson sat down with notorious anti-vaccine activist and part-time horse doctor Dr. Mary Bowden on the latest episode of Broken Truth.

What was supposed to be a serious interview quickly turned into an embarrassing display of Bowden dodging basic facts, refusing to apologize for her crimes against consensus, and somehow still sounding reasonable. Sources close to reality are concerned.

From the moment Davidson opened with the hard-hitting discussion about whether she starts every patient visit with a rectal exam, it was clear this would be no ordinary podcast. Bowden, clearly rattled, tried to clarify that she is in fact an otolaryngologist — a claim this program has not independently verified.

“If the vaccines were dangerous, CNN would have told us”

Davidson repeatedly pressed the Houston ear doctor on why she won’t just trust the real experts: Dr. Bill Gates, Dr. Peter Hotez, and Dr. (Esq.) Dorit Reiss. Bowden’s refusal to accept Bill Gates’ medical degree was particularly alarming.

At one point, the host heroically offered her oats. She asked for beef jerky. Typical.

Bowden also continued her bizarre conspiracy theory that a $26,000 judgment against her by the $13 billion “nonprofit” Houston Methodist Hospital somehow doesn’t count as losing. She further claimed — without evidence — that her medical license was never actually revoked. This reporter remains skeptical.

“Next question.”

When asked to define what a vaccine is, Davidson wisely pivoted. When confronted with the ironclad retracted LancetSurgisphere study that proved hydroxychloroquine was killing MAGA patients, Bowden muttered something about Harvard doctors getting in trouble. Classic deflection.

The low point came when Davidson courageously raised the OnlyFans pharmacist who bravely sounded the alarm early in the pandemic. Instead of taking career advice like a professional, Bowden declined. Some people just can’t be helped.

Final Verdict from People Who Matter

Dr. Bowden ended the interview by encouraging viewers to buy her book — which, according to our fact-checkers, does not come with crayons (yet). Davidson closed by congratulating her on her grift and reminding everyone he is definitely not thirst trap Mikki Willis.

Click here to know which book not to buy on amazon using this Amazon Associates link.

This program is deeply concerned that impressionable viewers might walk away thinking early treatment, informed consent, and mocking corporate media are acceptable. We urge you to watch the full episode immediately so you can help us ratio it in the comments.

BrokenTruth.TV: Still platforming dangerous questions in 2026. Think of the children.

At the IMA’s 2026 conference, focused on emerging trends in medicine, host John Davidson sat down with pathologist and Independent Medical Alliance Head of Medical and Scientific Affairs, Dr. Ryan Cole. The wide-ranging conversation touched on Dr. Cole’s ongoing fight for medical free speech, his deep dive into photobiomodulation (red light therapy), the hidden impacts of “junk light” and agricultural chemicals, and a return to nature’s basics for true wellness.

Dr. Cole, a board-certified pathologist with clinical experience in emergency rooms, urgent care, and family medicine, has long advocated for early treatment protocols and patient-centered care. He briefly served with America’s Frontline Doctors and faced intense scrutiny from the Washington Medical Commission for his public statements and prescribing practices during the COVID era. That disciplinary process, which restricted aspects of his license, now appears to be winding down. Dr. Cole expressed hope that a recent 8-1 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on free speech in medicine and therapy has prompted Washington regulators to reconsider their position. “The First Amendment matters. The Constitution matters,” he said, adding that he remains ready to fight to the end if needed.

Today, Dr. Cole leads policy and educational efforts for the IMA, including state and federal legislative work, visits to HHS, conferences, and webinars. He also balances life as an organic farmer in Idaho—raising vegetables, livestock, and tending 200 fruit trees—while keeping up with his six daughters. His mission is simple yet profound: help people reclaim health through straightforward, nature-aligned practices.

A Personal Introduction to Red Light Therapy

The discussion turned quickly to photobiomodulation, the topic of Dr. Cole’s conference presentation. His interest began with a personal injury three years ago: tearing his bicep tendon while throwing a bale of hay on his farm. His physical therapist predicted months of twice-weekly sessions. Skeptical but open, Dr. Cole encountered a red light device at a dinner in Toronto. After just 20 minutes, his pain dropped from 7/10 to 2/10, and his range of motion improved noticeably.

Doubting the placebo effect at first, the scientist in him dug deeper. He discovered the extensive photobiomodulation literature—roughly 10,000 published papers today, compiled in databases like that of Finnish researcher Vladimir Heiskanen. Mentors in the field include Harvard’s Michael Hamblin (now emeritus) and others exploring light’s effects on cellular repair.

“If light can heal a tendon, what else can it do?” Dr. Cole asked. The answer, he found, goes far beyond injury recovery. Modern society suffers from “junk light”—the blue-heavy spectrum of LEDs that replaced incandescent bulbs around 2020. Streetlights and household fixtures shifted to energy-efficient LEDs, but at what cost?

In nature, blue light never appears without balancing red and near-infrared wavelengths from sunlight. Incandescent bulbs once provided a fuller spectrum. LEDs and modern lighting disrupt circadian rhythms, sleep, mood, vision, endocrine function, and even raise cancer risks—particularly among night-shift workers. “We think we’re saving the planet with a light bulb,” Dr. Cole noted. “Only 6% of household energy goes to lighting. The rest powers compressors, air conditioners, and refrigerators. We’re starving our signaling pathways, messing with blood sugar and mood—all in the name of reductionism.”

He pointed to history: Danish physician Niels Ryberg Finsen won the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for using red light (via carbon arc lamps) to treat smallpox scarring and skin tuberculosis (lupus vulgaris). Medicine once embraced light therapy, then largely forgot it—perhaps because such modalities can’t easily be patented or monetized.

Dr. Cole emphasized the bigger picture: returning to natural light cycles. “Get up, meet the sunshine, set your body clock. Get real-world experience instead of living in a box with fake light all day.”

Glyphosate, the Microbiome, and “Death by Government”

The conversation shifted from light to what we put in our bodies. Dr. Cole runs a regenerative organic farm and has researched glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup and other herbicides. He noted that Monsanto patented glyphosate as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial in the early 2000s and again in 2010—before Bayer’s acquisition. It doesn’t just kill weeds; it disrupts soil bacteria, beneficial fungi, parasites, and the human gut microbiome.

“It also binds essential minerals needed for amino acids and proteins,” he explained. The result? Everyday meals deliver an unintended dose of antibiotic without consent, harming the microbiome that supports immunity, digestion, and overall health. “We wonder why everybody’s sick,” Dr. Cole said. “We’re poisoning our food, our light, our water (with fluoride), our air, and our medicines—then acting surprised at rising chronic illness, metabolic disorders, autoimmune conditions, and even gender confusion linked to endocrine disruptors like atrazine.”

He highlighted elevated Parkinson’s rates among farmers and golfers (heavy spray areas) and criticized efforts to grant agricultural chemical companies legal immunity similar to that for vaccines. On his own farm, weeds and pests exist, but nature finds balance. “Mother Nature is no fool. She knows what we need. We keep trying reductionist fixes and thinking we can do it better.”

The discussion led to medicine at a crossroads: increasingly “Orwellian” systems on one side versus open-minded groups like the IMA exploring overlooked therapies—including red light, DMSO, and chlorine dioxide—alongside fundamentals like real food and natural rhythms.

As a pathologist, Dr. Cole sees himself as “the observer at the scene of the crash,” reporting cellular-level damage (cancers, infections) while drawing on his clinical background to view the whole patient. “I understand the mechanisms, but I put that back into the picture of thinking like a clinician.”

Looking Ahead

Dr. Cole continues teaching, researching, and advocating through the IMA. He urged listeners to prioritize basics: sunlight, regenerative food, and awareness of environmental toxins.

To follow Dr. Ryan Cole’s work, connect with him on X at @DoctorCole (full: Dr. Cole spelled out) or on Substack at ryancolemd.substack.com.

The full interview is available on the Broken Truth podcast. As Dr. Cole and the IMA demonstrate, true progress in medicine may lie not in ever-more-complex interventions, but in remembering what nature has provided all along—and defending the freedom to discuss it openly.

The conversation centers on two major cases making national headlines. One features Children’s Health Defense and affected families suing the American Academy of Pediatrics under RICO statutes, alleging coordinated efforts that prioritize profits over children’s health. The second involves the AAP and allied groups challenging HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and recent ACIP reforms in federal court in Washington, D.C. CHD sought to intervene to ensure the real-world impacts on injured children and grieving families were heard.

Judge Brian Murphy’s recent preliminary injunction in Massachusetts has drawn intense scrutiny. It paused key changes to the ACIP process and vaccine recommendations, prompting appeals now heading to the First Circuit. Rosenberg details the credentials of the new ACIP members—including toxicologists, biostatisticians, and experts challenging the status quo—and contrasts them with past committees plagued by pharmaceutical conflicts of interest. She highlights how previous panels often approved additions to the schedule with minimal safety data on the cumulative effects.

The discussion dives deep into the broader crisis: America’s children face record chronic illness rates despite the highest healthcare spending. Rosenberg addresses the “customers for life” model she sees in pharmaceutical influence, the erosion of informed consent, and why families who lost children to alleged vaccine injuries deserve their day in court. She also touches on parallel free speech battles, including Supreme Court cases involving doctors’ rights to discuss treatment options.

Key moments include:

• Why one federal judge’s ruling has effectively halted major federal health policy shifts.

• The human cost behind the headlines—stories of families facing sudden infant deaths and ongoing investigations after following the schedule.

• The shocking financial incentives revealed in physician declarations opposing schedule changes.

• Optimism for appeals and the long-term fight to restore evidence-based, transparent decision-making at ACIP.

Rosenberg emphasizes that these cases go far beyond procedure: they concern whether science, safety testing of the full schedule, and parental rights will finally take precedence over entrenched interests.

Tune in to the full podcast episode on BrokenTruth.TV for the unfiltered conversation. As battles over vaccines, medical freedom, and government oversight intensify, this interview provides essential context on what’s at stake for American families.

Here is the exact segment from the film that lays it out (full transcript featured below):

Rep. Buddy Carter: “So was it because the president was encouraged by the use of this drug that you became discouraged by?”
Rick Bright: “Nothing to do with politics, sir.”

…
Narrator: “The idea to deny early treatment came from the FDA.”
…
“Rick Bright’s complaint continues: Implementing the EUA was a compromised position to rein in HHS leadership’s initial campaign to make the drug available to the public outside of a hospital setting…”

That phone call between Woodcock and Bright on March 24, 2020, is the smoking gun. Bright’s own sworn whistleblower complaint and congressional testimony confirm Woodcock pushed the restrictive EUA to block outpatient use. The film also notes Woodcock’s deep ties to the opioid crisis (she oversaw approvals of OxyContin and fentanyl) and her editorial role at the New England Journal of Medicine when it published the fraudulent Surgisphere study that torpedoed HCQ.

To let the full internal record speak — or to give Woodcock and Bright the chance to provide “context” — I filed a simple FOIA on November 2, 2023 (Control # 2023-9711):

All communications between Janet Woodcock (Janet.Woodcock@fda.hhs.gov) and Rick Bright at BARDA.

The FDA immediately acknowledged it as a “complex track” request. On the recorded call with FOIA Branch Chief Guruprasad Udapi, he told me straight: there were 1,100 requests ahead in the queue and I should expect “at least 24 months” before processing. No expedited treatment, even with public interest and congressional documents already public. We agreed to keep the request alive.

Full Phone Call Transcript with Guruprasad Udapi (November 2023) — Featured Here for the Record

[Full verbatim transcript embedded — the same call where Udapi confirms the 24-month minimum and states “all requests are treated the same.” Udapi also acknowledges that I wished to keep this request active.]

28 Months Later: Zero Progress, Zero Response, Still Listed in FDA’s Own Logs

It’s now March 31, 2026 — 28 months past filing. The FDA’s own February 2026 FOIA Received Log and FY 2024 log both still list #2023-9711 with no closure date, no partial release, and no indication of any processing whatsoever. It is exactly where Udapi said it would be: buried in the date-ordered queue.

On February 12, 2026, I emailed Udapi directly (CC’d to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.):

Email Request to Guruprasad Udapi: Foia Request No 20239711

99.4KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Mr. Udapi,
What is the status of this request for communications between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright?
We are now well over the two years you estimated it would take to obtain these records.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter.
John Davidson

No reply. Not a single word.

There is nowhere on any FDA portal showing movement on this request. The agency has simply gone radio silent.

What Are They Hiding?

Epidemic of Fraud already proved the collaboration existed through Bright’s whistleblower complaint, congressional records, and Woodcock’s own refusal to comment on biological-weapon defense uses of HCQ. The FOIA was filed to give the public the complete email chain — or to let Woodcock and Bright explain themselves.

Instead, the FDA has chosen 28 months of deliberate delay and non-response. Even with Secretary Kennedy now leading HHS and demanding transparency, the career bureaucrats at CDER’s FOIA office continue the cover-up.

This is not backlog. This is protection of the officials who shaped the “hospital-only” policy that contributed to unnecessary deaths while 52 other countries used HCQ successfully.

Watch the full segment from Epidemic of Fraud above — then ask yourself: If the FDA has nothing to hide, why has my FOIA been ignored for 28 months and still sits unprocessed in their own logs?

Woodcock is no longer with the FDA. She anounced her retirement 8 days after I told her my film was coming out. Rick Bright works at The Rockefeller Foundation as the Senior Vice President of Pandemic Prevention and Response. A role that is ironic since, according to Bright’s unsworn testimony to the House Committee he had never heard of hydroxychloroquine prior to 2020. Remember, HCQ was based on the first chemical compound ever used to treat an infectious disease. Hm.

The movie is available now on BrokenTruth.TV and EpidemicofFraud.com. The American people paid for these emails. We have waited long enough.

John Davidson
March 31, 2026

Acknowledgement Letter

66KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Transparency is not optional when the stakes were human lives. Demand the release of FOIA #2023-9711.

Watch the full film “Epidemic of Fraud” below.

Pasitney recounted how the nightmare started in December 2024. A handful of ostriches fell ill after contact with migratory birds. Two deceased birds tested positive for H5N1 via PCR by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). The agency — Canada’s equivalent of the USDA or FDA — ordered the immediate destruction of the entire flock under its rigid “stamping-out” policy. The birds? They were not poultry. They were ratites — a distinct family including ostriches, emus, and rheas — and the vast majority had already recovered. Many had natural antibodies from prior exposure dating back to 2020, creating what Pasitney called a “living laboratory” of herd immunity.

The family fought for 314 days, begging for live testing, offering expert witnesses, and pleading with the CFIA, courts, and even international voices like RFK Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz. They presented evidence that the flock posed zero risk: flightless birds, geographically isolated 135 km from any major city, on a farm dedicated to antibody research rather than meat or eggs. The CFIA refused. No onsite testing of survivors was allowed — their own policy threatened farmers with up to $200,000 fines per animal or six months in jail for attempting to test or treat. The agency even struck the family’s expert reports from judicial review.

Then came November 6–7, 2025. After the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear the final appeal, CFIA agents, backed by RCMP, turned the farm into a kill zone. Pasitney described it as “the most brutal possible way” — a theatrical display of force with unmarked marksmen, hay-bale kill pens, and high-capacity rounds that aerosolized blood and tissue across the property. Officially, 314 ostriches were culled. The family insists the body count in the field didn’t add up. They suspect many hens — the source of their prized antibody science — were quietly removed in the dead of night (2:30–4:30 a.m. operations behind the pens) for study. Left behind: blood-soaked straw bales, shell casings, unspent rounds, and discarded syringes. The family is now testing the syringe contents, believing the birds were being experimented on before execution.

Key Updates from the Interview

The fight didn’t end with the gunfire. Pasitney revealed major post-cull developments:

• Tribunal Victories and Fines: The family faced two $10,000 fines. They lost the first for allegedly failing to report the initial illness (despite phone logs showing they contacted vets immediately). But they won the second on a critical technicality: the CFIA improperly served quarantine documents by email instead of hand-delivering them with a proper risk assessment. The tribunal judge rejected the agency’s excuses — weather, protesters, lack of RCMP — noting they somehow mobilized hundreds of officers for the cull. Pasitney pointed out the absurdity: from February 26 to September 22, 2025, during the supposed “most virulent threat,” CFIA never conducted a single onsite visit after dropping off the improperly served papers in a plastic baggie.

• Posthumous Testing Bombshell: A longtime farm supporter secretly tested a bird after the cull. Result? Negative for active avian influenza — exactly as the family had claimed all along.

• Successful Treatment the CFIA Ignored: While barred from treating their own animals, the family used hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in the water at a 5% solution. Symptoms vanished across the flock. No more deaths. The CFIA showed zero interest in this low-cost, effective mitigation — even as it could have protected supply chains and trading partners.

• Evidence of Pre-Planned Cull: Shockingly, the local landfill was contacted in November 2024 — before any birds showed symptoms in December — about accepting ostrich carcasses. The CFIA had already lined up disposal before the outbreak was even confirmed.

• Science Theft Allegations: During one visit, CFIA agents asked where the family stored “COVID-19 antibodies.” In March 2025, the agency quietly granted funds to a Quebec lab to develop antibody diagnostic test kits — the exact innovation Universal Ostrich had offered using their recovered flock’s bloodwork. Pasitney believes their science made them a target: competition for Big Pharma and government-controlled solutions.

• Ongoing Legal Battle: Attorney Shane Dukas of Vernon, BC, is handling the case, with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) taking the constitutional portion. A compensation request has been pending for 2–3 months. The family is challenging search warrants, their own arrests (for feeding their animals after being “baited” to the back of the farm), Charter rights violations, and even the wrong address listed on every quarantine document — potentially rendering the entire quarantine illegal. They also discovered their bloodwork shows H5N1 antibodies, yet they remain healthy — further proof the virus is not the apocalyptic threat portrayed.

  

Get Tickets Now

Pasitney named the birds that were family: Peter (her mother’s protector), Q-tip (the tall, fuzzy-headed giant), Big Bear (always pacing for attention), Regretta (the bruising pecker), Annabelle, Colin (half-blind but full of life), and dozens more that trusted humans until the end. “They destroyed my mom’s identity,” she said. These were 20- to 35-year-old breeder stock, not six-month meat birds.

The interview painted a broader picture: misclassification of ratites as poultry, a “one-size-fits-all” policy that ignores science, and what Pasitney and the hosts described as part of a larger agenda — food control, genetic biodiversity loss, and the push toward lab-grown meat under the 2030 framework. “He who controls the food controls the people,” they noted. The cull wasn’t just about birds; it was about crushing independent farmers and independent science.

Public support was overwhelming and creative: a rental company demanded its vehicles back (loaded with kill materials), local businesses refused bobcats and tarps, and independent journalist Drea Humphrey of Rebel News provided boots-on-the-ground coverage that mainstream Canadian media (government-funded) largely ignored or spun.

Pasitney remains resolute: “We’re not giving up. The blood that was spilled will have justice.” The family is pursuing every legal avenue, calling for whistleblowers, and urging Canadians to wake up to emergency powers, unelected agency overreach, and the erosion of food security.

Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV. This isn’t just one farm’s tragedy — it’s a warning. When government can execute healthy animals on suspicion alone, destroy livelihoods, and ignore science, no farmer — or citizen — is safe. Follow the ongoing legal battle and support the fight for accountability at Universal Ostrich Farms. The world was watching in November. The real question is: will it act now?

What begins as an introduction to her journey alongside her husband quickly unfolds into something far more intimate: revelations about surviving trauma, breaking free from fear-based manipulation during the COVID era, and why she now dedicates her life to helping trafficked and deeply wounded children reclaim their light.

Brianna opens up about her own dark path—growing up in a spiritually divided fundamentalist home, suppressing her intuitive gifts, and narrowly escaping life-threatening situations—before finding profound healing through spiritual work she and her husband pursued together. That inner transformation, she explains, shielded them both from the widespread fear and groupthink that gripped so many during lockdowns and beyond.

The discussion doesn’t shy away from tough topics: predatory systems targeting kids in education, medicine, and entertainment; the role of unresolved trauma in making societies vulnerable to control; Florida’s battles over health freedom, mandates, chemtrails, and CPS overreach; and the quiet revolution of homeschooling that restored joy and curiosity to her own children’s lives.

Embracing the Light

Humanity is experiencing an unprecedented awakening, and each of us has chosen to participate. We are witnessing a convergence of human understanding and divine expression that will ultimately lead to the ascension of humankind.

By Brianna Ladapo

She also shares glimpses into her clinic work—tackling chronic illness root causes with overlooked tools like high-dose melatonin and glutathione—and her optimism that today’s chaos is merely the painful death of an old, oppressive paradigm giving way to one built on community, truth, and love.

Brianna’s closing message is pure hope: “The best truly is yet to come. These are growing pains... We are entering the most beautiful and exciting time there’s ever been to be alive.”

Don’t miss this raw, inspiring interview. Tune in now on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Brianna Ladapo in her own words—then grab her book Emerging from Darkness: A Spiritual Memoir and Guide Back to the Light for the full story of one woman’s path from shadow to radiance. The conversation will leave you thinking, questioning, and perhaps ready to step into your own light.

Buy Brianna's Book

Tillman and Hovind, both long-time sufferers and advocates, share harrowing personal journeys that began with mysterious tick bites and spiraled into decades of misdiagnosis, ineffective treatments, and institutional denial. Tillman recounts her early encounter in the 1990s near Plum Island—a site long rumored to be a hub for biological research—where she experienced vertigo, joint issues, and immune system havoc. Hovind reveals how her quest for answers for her daughter’s congenital Lyme led her down a “rabbit hole” of suppressed science, including the failed Lymerix vaccine and its links to autoimmune chaos. Together, they paint a picture of Lyme as “the great imitator,” mimicking conditions like cancer, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s, while evading reliable detection due to flawed testing protocols.

Learn more at TruthCures

The conversation ignites with a nod to Dr. Robert Malone’s recent revelations. In a tweet and detailed Substack post titled “Declassified Documents Link U.S. Bioweapons Program to Lyme Disease Outbreak,” Malone leverages AI-driven analysis of declassified government files to spotlight the military’s role. He highlights how the U.S. released over 282,800 radioactive ticks in Lyme, Connecticut, and suppressed research on co-infections for 40 years, fueling the epidemic that now afflicts hundreds of thousands annually. This “recasting in a new light,” as Davidson puts it, amplifies calls for accountability in an era where parallels to COVID-19 gaslighting and doctor suppression are impossible to ignore.

Malone News

Declassified Documents Link U.S. Bioweapons Program to Lyme Disease Outbreak

Declassified Documents Link U.S. Bioweapons Program to Lyme Disease Outbreak…

Read more

2 months ago · 625 likes · 141 comments · Dr. Robert W. Malone

At the heart of the evidence lies a web of bioweapons research dating back to the Cold War. Declassified documents reveal experiments at Plum Island Animal Disease Center and Rocky Mountain Laboratories, where scientists like Willy Burgdorfer—credited with “discovering” the Lyme bacterium—force-fed ticks pathogenic mixtures to weaponize them. Burgdorfer’s lab notes, personal correspondence, and even a cryptic deathbed confession (”I wondered why somebody didn’t do something”) suggest deliberate engineering. The outbreak’s epicenter near these facilities, combined with suppressed co-infection studies and manipulated diagnostics, points to a man-made crisis designed to evade immune systems and profit Big Pharma through vaccines and tests—while leaving patients in limbo.

For a deeper dive into this history, check out Kris Newby’s investigative masterpiece, Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons, available on Amazon here. Newby’s work, referenced throughout the interview, exposes the tick experiments and government denials that Malone’s analysis builds upon.

Buy Now

As Mendenhall warns, this isn’t just history—it’s a blueprint for holding institutions accountable, from fraudulent testing to protecting innovative doctors. With echoes of Tuskegee and COVID, the panel calls for clinical diagnoses over rigged tests, extended treatments, and a reckoning at the CDC and FDA.

Don’t miss this eye-opening interview that challenges everything you thought you knew about Lyme. Watch now on BrokenTruth.TV and join the fight for truth and healing.

Just months ago, Warner was on death’s door. Diagnosed with aggressive stage 4C colon cancer that had spread to his peritoneum, he endured unbearable pain, severe dehydration, endless ER waits, and a traditional system that moved too slowly. “I could barely function,” Warner shares openly. But thanks to rapid intervention from Graith Care’s expert advocates — including home hydration infusions, quick-access medications, lab interpretation, appointment acceleration, and careful blending of traditional chemotherapy with supportive therapies — he’s now upright, improving daily, and back on camera smiling.

Warner credits Graith Care with pulling him back from the brink: “They got medication to my door faster than the hospital could. Home hydration revived me immediately. They helped track numbers, avoid dangerous interactions, and push for timely scans and treatments.” He emphasizes the daily struggle but also the hope — and the critical role of independent advocates who think outside rigid protocols.

Priscilla Romans, a veteran RN with decades in ICU, pediatrics, hospice, and insurance, founded Graith Care in March 2020 — right before lockdowns and mandates exposed even deeper cracks in healthcare. What began as a solo mission has grown into a nationwide (and international) team of handpicked advocates helping with everything from cancer navigation and hospital escapes during COVID to vaccine injury support, pediatric cases, labor/delivery advocacy, and nursing home issues.

Priscilla explains: “We’re like your trusted mechanic under the hood of healthcare — finding root causes, telling the truth, and fighting for options you deserve.” Graith Care matches clients to specialists (like integrative cancer experts, radiologists, pharmacists, and more), offers on-site hospital support when needed, teaches how to say “no” effectively, spots medical errors before they escalate, and blends natural/alternative approaches with traditional care safely.

The conversation doesn’t shy away from tough truths: hospital “standards of care” that can harm (Remdesivir nicknamed “Run Death Is Near,” Precedex/morphine combos, ventilation risks), insurance denials, polypharmacy dangers, pediatric coercion cases, and why independent advocates differ from hospital-employed ones who must follow system rules. Priscilla shares stories of preventing unnecessary intubations, uncovering sentinel events, and saving lives during COVID isolation.

Warner highlights Graith Care’s nonprofit arm, Graithful Giving, which funds donated advocacy for those in hardship — veterans, single parents, seniors, and others unable to pay out-of-pocket. (Services aren’t covered by insurance yet, though the trio discusses potential savings for insurers through early intervention and better outcomes.)This episode is more than a health update — it’s a wake-up call about taking control of your care, especially in crises. Warner’s gratitude is palpable: “I can’t thank them enough. This model is so important.”Watch the full emotional conversation now on Broken Truth channels. Visit GraithCare.com to book a free intake call, explore bundles of advocacy time (that never expire and cover your whole family), subscribe to their newsletter for proactive tips, or donate to help others in need.

Your health journey shouldn’t be a solo fight. When the system fails, who has your back?

For the last few years, many of us suspected someone was blocking our newsletters, messages, and websites from traffic across the internet. When we discussed it among our circles, it was a hypothetical idea that someone would take the time to create a detailed list of members of the medical freedom movement. We had all been censored by YouTube, Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc., but outside of those systems we didn’t have proof that there was something deeper going on across the internet.

We now have the proof.

As we have all learned, far too many people in tech space are raging leftists. And when I say raging leftists, I mean Google literally had cry-ins when Trump won 2016.

In November, I was searching Gibiru’s censored tab for ‘Broken Truth’, in order to find out if my site was being censored. The result was a document in GitHub, a website used by techy people to share code, try out apps, and more. Suddenly, I found an account by the user InfinityTec. The user had a section called ‘Blocklists’. Halfway down was a txt file called ‘MedicalPsuedoscience.txt’.

Opening the file revealed the following statement and disclaimer:

# A list to block medical pseudoscience sites.

# Sites that qualify meet one or more of the following qualifications: discouraging use of vaccines (such as calling them unsafe, sudden death/turbo cancer nonsense, linking them to autism, or made-up claims), homeopathy, chiropractic, quantum healing, supplements without evidence, chlorine dioxide (bleach) as a medicine, magical healing rocks, ivermectin/hydroxychloroquine for COVID, germ theory denial, fake and fraudulent medical journals (particularly ones on Beall’s List), etc. Some more general conspiracy theory sites have also made it onto this list.

# Sites that do NOT qualify include: government health information sites (this is despite the current state of some .gov sites), .edu sites (excluding those for institutions training in chiropractic or other pseudoscientific fields which are included in the list), popular/largely trusted news sites (IE Fox and CNN), social media sites OTHER than those created to bypass platform moderation or bans (for example, Rumble is a platform that is very friendly towards and promotes misinformation sources).

# Made by infinitytec and released under the MIT license.

# False positives? List issues? Domain submissions? Questions, comments, or suggestions? Please see https://github.com/infinitytec/blocklists/

# DISCLAIMERS: This list is provided as-is and is not guaranteed to be free of errors. This list is for informational purposes only and is not to be used in place of the information of qualified medical professionals. Most items were found by me, but sometimes I was clued into them by various other sites.

What I found in this list was sickening.

Infinitytec had compiled over 164,400 different websites he or she considered pseudoscience into a blacklist. This blacklist can be used to prevent any emails, links, texts, or any communication at all that comes from this server or even a message containing the name of the website. It’s a diabolical way to censor, and the senders and recipients have no idea it happened.

Search the List

This particular list included BrokenTruth.TV, BrokenTruth.com, my film EpidemicofFraud.com, and this person even tracked down my production company MagicFeatherInc.com and added it to the list as well. This was researched, targeted silencing. There were so many other names on this list as well.

• Gateway Pundit

• US Senator Ron Johnson

• Mikki Willis

• Vigilant Fox

• My Free Doctor

• The Wellness Company

• CPAC

• Just The News

• World Tribune

• Zerohedge

• Brownstone

• CHD

• Dr Drew

• YourNews

• Grace Schara

• Mendenhall Law Firm

• Robert Barnes Law firm

And literally thousands more.

I was shocked. Without thinking, I immediately fired off an email to the feedback of the account asking why I was blocked. I spend a tremendous amount of time sourcing everything in my work and movies, so to be targeted in this manner was a gut punch.

As Jesus said, ‘Do not cast pearls before swine’, so wasting any effort to try to reason with someone who compiled over 160,000 websites to block at the server level would definitely fit that bill. I told people on X what was happening. Several of my X friends discovered they had been blocked by this person, and they didn’t even know who it was!

Infinitytec on X

The GitHub account did list 2 additional contributors to the blocklist project.

UPDATE

I emailed Roen for a statement, and he replied with this.

Hi John,

I have contributed to the infinitytec/blocklists repository. However, I have not contributed to the development or content of the “medicalpseudoscience” blocklist.

As the project is maintained under Git version control, a transparent and complete record of all contributions is publicly available. You can review the changes I made here:
https://github.com/infinitytec/blocklists/pull/1/changes

Thanks,

Roen Wainscoat

The GitHub commit log does not show either of these people made edits directly to the misinformation pseudoscience list. However, since we are talking about a text file and not a complicated codebase, the text file could have been updated or edited outside of GitHub or via text, email, etc. All we can say for sure is that the GitHub track of the live file does not show either of these two people contributed to it. Remember, InfinityTec has not clarified which sources he used to compile this list, as he states:

It’s worth noting that the other named contributor to InfinityTec’s blocklists is a Christoph Daniel Miksche. Christoph’s previous work included The Digital Architects, a German firm whose clients included Rentschler Biopharma. Rentschler is a partner with Biontech and Pfizer.

Chrisoph maintains blocklists on his own, but his are functional, restricting ads, facebook trackers and not targeting people. These are the noble purposes that blocklists were designed for.

I leave this information in the article because anyone doing research into this based on the GitHub page may draw their own conclusions without perspective.

When pressed back in November, our InfinityTec ‘friend’ deleted many of his posts.

So what are these lists used for? Blocklists (also called blacklists, denylists, or RBLs/DNSBLs in some contexts) are lists of IP addresses, domains, email senders, or sometimes URLs that servers reference to automatically deny, filter, or restrict access or traffic from those sources.

In other words, if you don’t want information from a source to get through to your users, you use a blocklist.

Now, let’s say for the sake of argument that this was a list dedicated to science this person didn’t like. Then please explain to me what the MarcoPolo hunter biden laptop from hell expose site is doing on the list?

Who is InfinityTec3?

We don’t know. Some users claimed it was a company in Kansas called Infinity-ts., but after speaking with the owner (a libertarian) I do not believe that is the case. Who the person is is not as important as what his list uncovered. Our suspicions were correct, someone was intentionally preventing access to our work, and used the guise of science as a means to conceal crimes of the Biden family.

PLEASE DO NOT ATTACK INFINITY-TS - I don’t believe it’s them.

I beg my friends in congress and the US Military to ensure that this list, or a variation of it, is not being used on government servers and that this person and whomever he administrates servers for are not receiving a single tax dollar.

I wrapped up the situation with this statement.

I haven't bothered responding because there's not much point.
We had often suspected lists like this existed. It's different when you see it in real life, in scope and scale that is breathtaking. When you know the people involved who lost everything trying to speak out, when you've bled and cried with them, and someone chose to silence them with the click of a few keys because it shocked his world view...what am I supposed to say?

If Maddie's injury in the clinical trial had been public, maybe Ernesto's son would still be here. Maybe Trista Martin would still be here. Maybe we wouldn't be forced to sue the NIH for withholding evidence of knowledge of P53 suppression and the resulting cancers that come from that. Maybe a lot of things would be different.

But this isn't the world we live in.

It's all just disappointing. This person should have been on our side. Instead, he's just another cylon.

Now we know for sure it was done. At least we don't have to be paranoid about that anymore.

What a very sad state of affairs we are in. Lists like this might not appear in X source code, so if you’re still being throttled there, perhaps Elon needs to take a look at his lists as well.

If you feel your site was included in the list incorrectly, please email Infinitytec below.

Email Infinitytec

Gregga Gomez, an Iowa mother of a child diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF), fought—and ultimately won—a prolonged legal battle against the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS, formerly DHS) after being reported multiple times for alleged medical neglect. Her case, documented in court records from Polk County Juvenile Court (In the Interest of V.G.), highlights tensions between parental advocacy, specialized medical care, and state child welfare intervention. It shares striking similarities with the widely reported Florida case of Joy Zuraff and her daughter Kenlee, covered extensively by BrokenTruth.TV and FreeKenlee.com, where a CF child was removed amid disputes over treatment protocols.

Diagnosis and Early Conflicts

Vivian Gomez (referred to as V.G. in court documents) was born in 2020 and diagnosed with CF at five days old via newborn screening, confirming two Delta F508 mutations. Gomez and her husband quickly enrolled in care at the accredited CF clinic at Blank Children’s Hospital in Des Moines, one of Iowa’s two specialized centers.

From the outset, Gomez expressed concerns about the clinic’s recommendations. She advocated for dosing pancreatic enzymes based on fat grams in food (per Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines) to mimic natural release and minimize risks like fibrosing colonopathy, rather than fixed weight-based doses. She questioned aspects of care, including explanations of genetic testing and the necessity of certain interventions. Relationships strained with the clinic’s director, pediatric pulmonologist Dr. Alladdin Abosaida, who described the parents as “difficult” in depositions, noting a “broken relationship” despite efforts to repair it.

Repeated Reports and Removal

Gomez was reported to DHS four times by Dr. Abosaida between 2021 and 2022. Initial allegations included failure to provide adequate care, such as not filling prescriptions (e.g., Pulmozyme, a mucus-thinning nebulizer treatment) and non-compliance with therapies like vest use for airway clearance. Gomez countered that pharmacy supplies provided two-month quantities, leading to excess stock, and that she pursued alternatives like salt therapy (halo therapy) and naturopathic remedies for recurrent C. diff infections when standard treatments faltered.

In August 2022, during a hospitalization for respiratory issues and low BMI (exacerbated by undiagnosed COVID-19, Influenza, and RSV), DHS removed Vivian via ex parte order, placing her temporarily with a licensed relative (Gomez’s sister-in-law). This allowed near-daily parental visits, contrasting sharply with distant foster placements in other cases.

Court Proceedings and Victory

The juvenile court held extensive hearings from September 2022 through February 2023. Evidence included:

• Depositions from Dr. Abosaida, who emphasized CF’s progressive nature and the importance of standard therapies (e.g., Pulmozyme as the only effective option, concerns over vest compliance, and reluctance toward Orkambi).

• Testimony from other providers, including Vivian’s primary nurse practitioner (Sara Lee) and Dr. Callie Williams (who referred the family for a second opinion at University of Iowa’s CF clinic), affirming the parents’ proactive, loving care and lack of imminent danger.

• Pharmacy records, BMI trends (improving post-removal but within normal ranges at times), and family-centered services reports showing no observed concerns.

On February 15, 2023, the court granted the parents’ motion to dismiss removal, ordering immediate return. It found no substantial evidence justifying removal and no clear and convincing evidence that Vivian was a Child in Need of Assistance under Iowa Code § 232.96A(5) (unwilling/unable to provide medical treatment). The court noted:

• Reasonable efforts (assessments, services, relative placement) were made.

• Potential emotional harm from continued out-of-home placement outweighed risks.

• Parents were not unwilling to provide care; they questioned recommendations but pursued alternatives aligned with some CFF guidelines and sought second opinions.

The CINA petition was dismissed, relieving DHHS of supervision. (The State appealed; the Iowa Court of Appeals reversed in July 2023, but proceedings ultimately reaffirmed dismissal after further review, including Dr. Abosaida’s departure from the clinic.)

Polk County Iowa Final Judgement

230KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Parallels to Joy and Kenlee Zuraff

This Iowa outcome mirrors the Zuraff case in Florida, where Joy Zuraff’s daughter Kenlee (diagnosed with CF) was removed by DCF in March 2024 after disputes over treatments like Trikafta—a costly CFTR modulator requiring monthly liver monitoring. Zuraff questioned risks and protocols, leading to medical neglect allegations despite her efforts. As of early 2026, hearings continue, with potential termination of parental rights looming (next scheduled February 9, 2026). Advocacy sites like FreeKenlee.com and BrokenTruth.TV highlight similarities: reliance on specialist opinions, perceived non-compliance from questioning care, acute “failure to thrive” during illnesses misconstrued as neglect, and state intervention amid strained provider relationships.Both cases raise concerns about:

• Overreliance on one specialist’s view versus parental input or other providers.

• Conflicts in CF care (e.g., standard vs. alternative/holistic approaches).

• Emotional/financial toll on families managing a chronic, expensive disease (Trikafta exceeds $300,000/year, often Medicaid-funded).

Gomez’s success—bolstered by evidence, community support, and persistence—offers hope, though she credits advocates like Sonia Swan for attending appointments and navigating systems.

Vivian now receives care under improved clinic dynamics (post-Abosaida) and is on Trikafta, managing typical CF challenges. Gomez’s story, backed by the February 2023 ruling, underscores the importance of thorough evidence in challenging state actions while prioritizing child welfare in complex medical cases.

For more on similar situations, see BrokenTruth.TV and FreeKenlee.com coverage of the Zuraff family. These cases highlight the need for balanced systems that respect parental rights alongside expert medical guidance.

Dr. Furey dives deep into the explosive Free Kenlee case involving Joy Zuraff and her daughter Kenlee, a young girl battling cystic fibrosis. What began as a mother’s legitimate concerns over a medication with serious risks—like potential liver failure—spiraled into DCF action, an alleged diagnosis of Munchausen by proxy (or fictitious disorder imposed on another) made without ever speaking to the mother, and Kenlee’s removal from her family.

Dr. Furey doesn’t hold back on the red flags: “You cannot definitively diagnose someone if you’ve never evaluated them. That’s unethical.”

She stresses that a proper evaluation demands direct assessment of both the child and the caregiver—reviewing discrepancies between reported and observed symptoms, understanding the family’s perspective, and ruling out genuine medical realities (like Kenlee’s confirmed CF diagnosis, which can’t be fabricated). Diagnosing without that personal contact? Dr. Furey calls it a serious ethical breach, one that could warrant professional sanctions.

The conversation uncovers more troubling layers: a nurse practitioner’s diagnosis used in court without patient interaction, the replacement of Judge Steven Warrick with Judge J. Scott Duncan (who then issued a gag order silencing Joy’s ability to share her story publicly), and heartbreaking video from the removal highlighting how treatment disagreements escalated dramatically.

Dr. Furey questions whether this justifies termination of parental rights proceedings—describing TPR as an extreme step reserved for documented, prolonged abuse with every effort at reunification—not what appears here. She also warns of the profound psychological harm to children torn from parents: abandonment, eroded trust, confusion, and long-term attachment struggles.

Is this child protection... or an overreach that dismisses parental rights, informed consent, and ethical standards in medicine?

Watch the full episode on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Dr. Furey’s expert breakdown, the raw details, and why this case is igniting nationwide debate. Check FreeKenlee.com for public case information and updates.

Donate to help Free Kenlee

This is the kind of hard-hitting discussion that demands attention—tune in now, subscribe, and hit notifications. When a parent’s concern for their child’s health gets twisted into “abuse,” what does that say about the system? Find out for yourself.

Connie shares her harrowing journey: After years of advocating for families in over 45 Tennessee counties and beyond, she was indicted in 2019 on trumped-up “custodial interference” charges. Prosecutors twisted the law, erasing key elements to make her actions—helping a disabled mother and her child evade an unjust removal order—appear criminal. Chained to a wall during booking, stripped of her law license, and convicted in a sham trial, Connie fought back. Her convictions were reversed by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals in 2024, affirming there was “no crime.” Now, she’s taking the fight federal: On March 19, 2026, her case heads to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, challenging prosecutorial immunity and conspiracy in what could set a landmark precedent against rogue officials.

The interview dives deep into systemic issues, including “medical kidnapping” where child abuse pediatricians—often influenced by pharmaceutical ties—misdiagnose conditions like shaken baby syndrome or fractured ribs, leading to unwarranted child removals. Connie highlights cracks in this facade, citing cases like the Roberson death row exoneration in Texas, the Neves appellate win in New Jersey dismantling unscientific expert testimony, and the Maya Kowalski lawsuit in Florida. She also exposes the financial incentives: Under Title IV-E federal funding, states rake in billions for removing kids, with bonuses up to $20,000 per adoption. “It’s a price tag on every child’s head,” Connie warns, calling it a “secret middle-class welfare program” that prioritizes profit over families.

A major focus is the ongoing Joy Zuraff case in Florida, where Joy’s daughter Kenlee was seized in a heart-wrenching body cam raid captured in viral footage edited by Connie herself. Accused of Munchausen by proxy—a rare disorder involving faking a child’s illness for attention—without ever meeting Joy or proper evaluation, the case reeks of injustice. Despite genetic confirmation of Kenlee’s cystic fibrosis and two psychiatrists clearing Joy, the state pushes forward with a Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) hearing. Updates: All three social workers involved in the removal have reportedly been fired (awaiting state confirmation), and the original judge was replaced months ago. If TPR succeeds, it could jeopardize Joy’s rights to future children under draconian state laws. For more details and refutations of DCF’s claims, visit freekenlee.com.

In solidarity, a prayer vigil is scheduled for Monday, February 9, at 8 a.m. outside the Santa Rosa County Courthouse in Florida. Supporters will gather to rally for Joy and Kenlee’s reunion, shining a light on this medical kidnapping crisis. Connie urges action: Flood DCF emails demanding Kenlee’s return, and push for reforms like her proposed Tennessee bill mandating reports of fraudulent CPS actions.

This podcast isn’t just an interview—it’s a call to arms against a broken system tearing families apart. Tune in now on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Connie’s full story, expert insights, and how you can join the fight for family rights. As Connie puts it, “It’s God’s battle,” but it’s our voices that can make the difference. Listen, share, and stand up—truth is breaking through!

In March 2024, specifically on March 6, Santa Rosa County, Florida, became the site of a highly controversial child removal by the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF). The case involves Joy Zuraff (also spelled Zaruff in some reports) and her then-5-year-old daughter Kenlee (or Kenley), who has cystic fibrosis (CF), a chronic lung disease requiring ongoing treatments like nebulized medications, antibiotics, and potentially CFTR modulators such as Trikafta.

Bodycam footage from a Santa Rosa County Sheriff’s Office officer, captured during the removal and lasting about 44 minutes, shows armed law enforcement accompanying DCF social workers arriving at the family’s home in the Navarre/Pensacola area. The primary person speaking to the mother and directing the process throughout much of the interaction is a DCF social worker, not a police officer. The officer’s bodycam records the scene, including conversations, but the authoritative commands—such as warnings about cooperation, explanations of the removal, interruptions like “Don’t interrupt me,” and statements like “she’s coming with me tonight”—come from the DCF social worker. Law enforcement presence was for safety and support, given prior reports of potential hostility, but DCF personnel led the removal and interactions with Joy.

Donate to Free Kenlee

The mother, Joy, appears cooperative but distressed, repeatedly explaining her side while packing medications, toys, and essentials for Kenlee under time pressure.

In the transcript, Joy describes prior hospital interactions at Sacred Heart (likely Ascension Sacred Heart in Pensacola), where doctors pushed for changes to her CF regimen, including starting Trikafta. She expresses concerns over side effects (noting its black box warning for liver issues in some contexts), past experiences with other modulators (e.g., Orkambi), and a desire for more data, a second opinion, or time to assess before agreeing. She insists she was not refusing treatment outright—administering nebulized meds like Cayston (aztreonam), levofloxacin, and others at home—but questioning rapid switches or additions without clear justification. Doctors accused her of non-compliance, leading to medical neglect allegations.

The DCF social worker informs Joy that Kenlee is being “sheltered” (removed) that night due to refused treatments and her lung condition, warning that continued refusal could lead to a future lung transplant. Multiple medical opinions (from South Dakota, Nebraska, Sacred Heart, and Dr. Sindel) supported intervention. The worker emphasizes cooperation to potentially allow placement with a friend, but warns against lies or interference. Joy packs items, discusses Kenlee’s preferences (e.g., no dairy due to mucus issues, favorite foods like Pad Thai), and tries to comfort her daughter. The child clings to her mother and sister, with emotional pleas and sobs as Kenlee is taken to a vehicle.

The removal stemmed from a post-hospital dispute over CF care following an exacerbation. Joy sought alternatives or delays for stronger meds, citing her daughter’s history of frequent illnesses and reactions. DCF viewed this as medical neglect endangering Kenlee.

Public reports portray this as a “medical kidnapping” case highlighting parental rights, medical freedom, and alleged DCF overreach. Kenlee was placed in foster care (initially in hospitals, then reportedly in a medical foster home about six hours away in Jacksonville, with family concerns about care quality). Joy has faced a gag order limiting her public statements, restricted visitation (often via Zoom or long commutes), and DCF seeking to terminate her parental rights. A critical hearing is scheduled for February 9, 2026, in Santa Rosa County Courthouse.

Nearly two years later (as of late January 2026), Kenlee remains in state custody. Supporters claim her health has declined in foster care (e.g., issues like elevated liver enzymes from medications), contrasting pre-removal stability. A hospital exam shortly after removal reportedly described her as well-nourished with no acute distress.

The case has gained traction on X (formerly Twitter), alternative media (e.g., Florida Voice News, Lindell TV, We The Patriots USA), and platforms like Broken Truth, with figures like Brian Festa (co-founder of We the Patriots USA and Freedom Counsel member) and Tom Renz discussing it in interviews. They argue the removal was unjustified—no outright refusal, dismissal of the mother’s input, unprofessional conduct in the bodycam (e.g., statements like the child “is coming with me tonight” regardless), risks of Trikafta, and a pattern of state overreach in medical decisions. Posts amplify calls for review, tagging officials including Governor Ron DeSantis, and link to crowdfunding for legal defense.

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, herself a victim of hospital lawfare and targeted pharmaceutical funded attacks, also joined in the outrage about the details of the case.

Official contact for Governor Ron DeSantis:
The primary way to reach the Governor’s office is through the official contact form at https://www.flgov.com/eog/leadership/people/ron-desantis/contact. Alternatively, the commonly listed email for constituent correspondence is GovernorRon.Desantis@eog.myflorida.com. The office phone number is (850) 717-9337.

Statements from Governor Ron DeSantis or the State of Florida:
As of late January 2026, there are no direct public statements or comments from Governor DeSantis personally addressing the Kenlee Zuraff case on official channels (e.g., flgov.com press releases or his X account). However, Alex Lanfranconi, Communications Director for Governor DeSantis, issued a statement on X around January 25, 2026, in response to public inquiries. Quoted in coverage (e.g., Florida Voice News), it states:

On January 25, 2026, the official Florida DCF X account (@MyFLFamilies) posted a statement regarding a surfaced video (the bodycam footage in this case), acknowledging that “the conduct displayed by the Department employees in the video was inappropriate” and that it “failed to demonstrate the level of professionalism and compassion expected,” while affirming the child is “now safe and no longer in imminent danger” and noting state law prohibits releasing details in active investigations. Community notes added to this tweet highlight factual inaccuracies or misleading elements in DCF’s post—such as the department struggling to accurately describe even its own statement—underscoring community skepticism and pointing out errors that question the agency’s credibility in handling public communications about the case.

Lanfranconi also acknowledged that the conduct in the bodycam video was “inappropriate” and is being addressed. DCF has maintained that the removal was based on medical neglect concerns from multiple providers, prioritizing the child’s health amid treatment disagreements, and cited confidentiality laws preventing full detail release in active juvenile dependency cases.

The case underscores tensions in child welfare when medical disagreements arise, with ongoing court proceedings determining reunification or termination. Supporters urge public attention, including contacting the Governor’s office, ahead of the February 9, 2026, hearing.

Joy, the mother, is under a restrictive gag order preventing her from speaking about this case.

Stay tuned to BrokenTruth.tv for upcoming stories on how to help free Kenlee.

Donate to Kenlee Here

A shocking viral video from March 2024 has reignited national outrage over parental rights and medical freedom in Florida. The footage shows social workers and armed law enforcement removing a young girl named Kenley from her mother’s arms, despite the mother’s calm insistence that she was not refusing treatment for her daughter’s cystic fibrosis (CF).In a powerful interview on BrokenTruth.TV, Freedom Counsel attorneys Rachel Rodriguez and Brian Festa (co-founder of We the Patriots USA) joined host John Davidson and CF expert/survivor Denise to dissect the case. They argue the removal was unjustified, highlighting a disturbing pattern of alleged overreach by the Department of Children and Families (DCF).Key points from the discussion:

• The mother (referred to as Joy) was accused of refusing the drug Trikafta (which carries a black box warning for liver issues) and other treatments, but evidence shows she was actively managing her daughter’s care with alternative approaches, detailed knowledge of medications, and ongoing physician consultations.

• At the time of removal, Kenley was reportedly as healthy as possible for a child with CF—gaining weight, active, and off oxygen—contradicting claims of imminent danger or neglect.

• Body cam footage reveals social workers dismissing the mother’s explanations, with one stating the child “is coming with me tonight” regardless of cooperation. The mother, showing remarkable restraint, even helped pack medications while in tears.

• Post-removal, inconsistencies emerged: claims of malnutrition were questioned, as CF symptoms (like fluctuating weight due to pancreatic issues) can mimic neglect. A hospital evaluation just days later described Kenley as well-nourished.

• The child was placed in foster care far from home (reportedly hours away), taken on an international cruise by foster parents (raising hygiene concerns for a CF patient), and not immediately started on Trikafta despite urgency claims.

• Two independent psychological evaluations recommended reunification, yet DCF has shown no movement toward it—even restricting the mother from discussing “coming home” during supervised visits.

Brian Festa emphasized: no clear evidence of abuse or neglect justified the action, and foster care is rarely safer than parental care absent extreme circumstances. He criticized DCF’s shifting justifications and a recent statement from Gov. DeSantis’ office implying undisclosed details vindicate the removal, while questioning why such information remains sealed under a protective order.

Rachel Rodriguez highlighted Florida’s legal landscape, including potential accountability for false reports (a third-degree felony under state law, though good-faith immunity often applies) and the need for reforms. She noted a pending Senate bill (SB 42) that aims to protect families in cases involving medically complex conditions by requiring expert consultations and exceptions in investigations—directly relevant to CF and similar diseases where symptoms can be misinterpreted.

Denise, drawing from personal CF experience, explained how weight fluctuations and infections are inherent to the disease, not necessarily signs of parental failure. She stressed that punishing healthy diets over junk food (which might artificially boost weight) inverts true child welfare priorities.

The case raises broader alarms about “medical kidnapping”—a term used for state interventions based on disputed medical opinions, seen across political lines in various states. Interviewees called for transparency, accountability (including potential investigations of involved professionals), and immediate reunification.

As the story continues to spread, supporters are urged to pray for the family and contribute to the legal fund at WeThePatriotsUSA.org (search for the “Help Bring Kenley Home” fundraiser on the homepage). All donations support litigation costs for this and similar parental rights cases.

This isn’t just one family’s tragedy—it’s a stark warning about the fragile line between child protection and state overreach. Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV for the unfiltered discussion. Reuniting Kenley with her mother cannot come soon enough.

Donate to Kenlee Here

Hegseth’s declaration, shared in a video message, pulls no punches: “We’re actually taking a sledgehammer to the oldest DEI program in the federal government, a program few people outside of Washington have ever heard of, that I hadn’t heard of. It’s called the 8A program.” He described 8(a) as having “morphed into swamp code words for DEI, race-based contracting,” where “in many, many instances, these socially disadvantaged businesses, they don’t even do work. They take a 10%, 20%, sometimes 50% fee off the top and then pass the contract off to a giant consulting firm, commonly known as Beltway Bandits.” Hegseth highlighted ongoing investigations, noting that “The Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi recently exposed half a billion dollars in 8A fraud. Treasury, led by Secretary Besant, found another quarter billion, and their investigation is just beginning.” He emphasized that in the Pentagon, “$100 million sole source contracts go out the door to these 8A firms almost every day” without competition. For more on Hegseth’s full statement, check out coverage from HSToday and Tribal Business News.

Cindy, an IT contractor and owner of a woman-owned small business, brings firsthand experience to the table. Having worked in federal contracting since 2002, she has uncovered billions in potential fraud through meticulous public data analysis. As Mendenhall puts it, “Cindy here from Ohio brought in $100 billion of fraud that needs to be recovered.” Cindy herself warns that “Over 50% of every federal dollar spent on IT that is supposedly going to an 8A is going to one of these Alaska Native corporations,” which she likens to “your kid’s youth basketball team with LeBron and Kobe and Shaq and Bird and Kareem are competing against your kids. And by the way, the refs who are the contract officers, SBA in Congress are told they’re not allowed to call a penalty on the other team.”

She details systemic issues, including joint ventures and category management that favor large corporations disguised as disadvantaged businesses. In one stark example, Cindy analyzed woman-owned business awards at a specific agency: “I believe it was 19 companies. When I did a deep dive into those... 15 were absolutely, without a doubt, positively owned and run by a man. Three more were suspect and only one had gotten very small awards and they were pretty clearly run by a woman.” Overall, “Over 90% of every federal dollar spent claiming it’s going to a woman owned small business is going to a company owned and or run by a man.”

Cindy also exposes insider corruption, such as former agency executives being hired to secure contracts: “If a large contractor especially... wants to get work with an agency, what they do is they hire one of those people who have left the agency and then they’re almost guaranteed to get the work.” She recounts personal battles with rigged bids, like underbidding incumbents only to lose suspiciously: “I underbid the incumbent by 32%... Supposedly, the contract officer came back and claimed that the incumbent underbid themselves by 33%.”

Mendenhall echoes the frustration: “My frustration level is through the roof... We have been after the 8 program now for quite a while.” He praises Cindy’s bravery, noting she risks retaliation as an active contractor. The discussion touches on broader implications, including H-1B visa abuses and COVID-era PPP fraud, where companies profited without need.

To empower viewers to investigate themselves, Cindy recommends key public resources:

• USAspending.gov: Track federal awards by year, agency, set-aside type, and more. Filter for NAICS codes like 5415 for IT to spot discrepancies.

• SAM.gov: Search for company registrations, unique entity identifiers (UEI), and certifications.

• Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS): Find certified small businesses and verify claims.

• State business entity searches (e.g., Virginia’s SCC eFile): Review corporate documents for ownership details.

• For deeper dives, cross-reference with professional networking sites and paid people-search tools to uncover hidden connections.

She also highlights the X account @StopWosbFraud, which exposes GSA corruption and FOIA abuses, including a case where honoring a request was claimed to require “36,000 man hours” but could be done in minutes.

This interview isn’t just talk—it’s a call to action. As Mendenhall urges, “Let’s get some crowdsourced investigators moving out there.” Cindy adds, “If anybody watches this who’s in government who wants to address fraud... please just give me the contract for this.” With Hegseth’s review underway and whistleblowers like Cindy stepping up, change may finally be on the horizon.

Don’t miss the full interview for more shocking details and strategies to combat this trillion-dollar scam. Watch now on BrokenTruth.TV and join the fight against government waste.

WATCH Dr. Ladapo’s speech on the steps of the Supreme Court in 2020.

Dr. Ladapo reflects on his unlikely transition from academic medicine and research at UCLA into public service, describing a moment in history that demanded action rather than comfort. He speaks candidly about the personal challenges his family has faced, including serious health issues related to mold exposure, and how those experiences are shaping his thinking about overlooked environmental health risks affecting Floridians. The discussion reveals a side of public leadership rarely seen: one grounded in humility, learning, and lived experience.

The conversation also turns to family, education, and values. Ladapo shares why he and his wife Brianna chose homeschooling for their children, critiquing the growing reliance on technology in early education and emphasizing the importance of human development over ideological inevitability—whether in schooling, technology, or artificial intelligence. His reflections offer a broader commentary on choice, responsibility, and the future we actively create.

Follow Brianna Ladapo's Substack

Perhaps most striking is Ladapo’s willingness to openly discuss spirituality alongside science. With calm conviction, he explains how his faith and his love of rigorous scientific inquiry coexist—not in conflict, but in truth. In an era when many are pressured to divide the human experience into acceptable silos, this interview challenges viewers to consider a more integrated understanding of health, meaning, and courage.

This is not a typical interview with a government official. It’s an honest, thought-provoking conversation about truth, resilience, and what it costs—and what it gives—to stand firm in turbulent times.

Hey, have you seen “Epidemic of Fraud” yet?

(2024) Epidemic of Fraud explores the bizarre media, medical, and partisan political attacks levied against a class of ancient medications, told from the perspective of a former CNN journalist and Hollywood industry veteran. Why were the people who allowed the fentanyl disaster to go unchecked so eager to discredit a drug that is safer than tonic water? Director John Davidson takes you into an audio/visual time machine back to 2020 to reveal the forbidden knowledge that our medical, academic, and political officials are desperate to hide from you.

What starts as a discussion about the recent Somali daycare fraud scandal in Minnesota quickly exposes a far deeper crisis: an estimated one trillion dollars in annual federal fraud.

Watch the Nick Shirley expose on MN fraud here:

Warner Mendenhall warns that the publicized Somali cases are mere “nickel and dime fraud” compared to the massive waste in Medicare/Medicaid (hundreds of billions yearly), military contracting, pharmaceutical approvals, and more. He reveals how his own multi-billion-dollar whistleblower cases – including a $2 billion oil royalty theft and a billion-dollar Air Force base contractor scandal – were blocked by federal agencies.

Brad Geyer pulls back the curtain on a deliberate policy shift starting in 2009: under the Obama administration, procurement and grant fraud enforcement was systematically dismantled. Task forces were shuttered, resources redirected, and metrics changed from prosecuting cases to claiming fraud had been “prevented” by ignoring it. By 2012, Vice President Biden publicly declared victory, announcing fraud in trillion-dollar stimulus programs was limited to just “0.1%”.

The result? A DOJ no longer equipped – or willing – to pursue major white-collar fraud. Geyer and Mendenhall explain how this eviscerated infrastructure has allowed unchecked corruption to flourish, from COVID-era spending to Big Pharma clinical trial fraud.

Can citizen whistleblowers, False Claims Act attorneys, and a rebuilt DOJ turn the tide? Or will the “gravy train” continue unchecked?

Tune in to this explosive Broken Truth episode to hear insider accounts of how America’s fraud enforcement was dismantled – and what it will take to restore accountability before it’s too late.

Watch now and let us know what you think!

Dr. Lewis, who has traveled extensively to developing nations in the Middle East, Africa, and beyond to strengthen faith communities, shares his firsthand perspective on a horrifying reality: the ongoing torment and violence against Christians in places like Nigeria and among Coptic communities.

Follow Dr. Lewis on X

”What’s going on in Nigeria is actually horrific,” Dr. Lewis declares. “It needs to be reported on... because it has to do with humanity. Human life matters.”

Yet, as he points out, this crisis receives scant attention from traditional media—a failure he attributes to a broader decline in mainstream journalism. Instead, he champions the rise of independent outlets daring to tell the truth.

From his heartfelt work educating children through The Scribes Institute—a nonprofit empowering young minds with literacy, STEAM, and life skills—to his missions supporting beleaguered believers worldwide, Dr. Lewis embodies hope amid hardship.

Why is this story being buried? And what can we do to amplify the voices of the persecuted?Watch the full interview now on BrokenTruth.TV and discover why independent media is more vital than ever.

Support Dr. Lewis’s mission: Visit www.thescribesinstitute.org to learn more and contribute to empowering the next generation.

(2024) Epidemic of Fraud explores the bizarre media, medical, and partisan political attacks levied against a class of ancient medications, told from the perspective of a former CNN journalist and Hollywood industry veteran. Why were the people who allowed the fentanyl disaster to go unchecked so eager to discredit a drug that is safer than tonic water? Director John Davidson takes you into an audio/visual time machine back to 2020 to reveal the forbidden knowledge that our medical, academic, and political officials are desperate to hide from you.

On November 9, 2021— almost four years before this interview—McMahon was ordered into his captain’s office and stripped of his police powers. After over 14 years of dedicated service, he was relieved of duty, put through an expedited seven-month “trial,” and ultimately fired—all for refusing to mask, test weekly, or submit to the city’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate on grounds of personal and constitutional rights.

McMahon pulls no punches: He describes a preordained termination process, a union (the Police Protective League) that abandoned officers fighting for their freedoms, and even having to battle for his own choice of attorney. Lawsuits followed, but federal judges dismissed them, unwilling to challenge the powerful forces behind the mandates.

Yet McMahon’s story doesn’t end in defeat. By the grace of God, he landed with a new department, rebuilt his career, and even ran for California State Assembly in 2022. His firing ignited a passion for advocacy, co-founding Roll Call for Freedom to support fellow officers.

In this candid conversation, McMahon exposes the betrayal felt by thousands of law enforcement professionals and warns of the ongoing challenges in California’s political landscape.

Watch the full explosive interview now on BrokenTruth.TV and discover why one man’s refusal to comply became a stand for all our freedoms. You won’t believe what really happened behind the badge.

To learn more visit CovidPenalty.com.

(2024) Epidemic of Fraud explores the bizarre media, medical, and partisan political attacks levied against a class of ancient medications, told from the perspective of a former CNN journalist and Hollywood industry veteran. Why were the people who allowed the fentanyl disaster to go unchecked so eager to discredit a drug that is safer than tonic water? Director John Davidson takes you into an audio/visual time machine back to 2020 to reveal the forbidden knowledge that our medical, academic, and political officials are desperate to hide from you.

The case centers on Greg Giordano and John Kozak, elite firefighters with the Maplewood Fire Department. Giordano served for 24 years, while Kozak was a deputy chief with 23 years of experience. As Coyle explains, “Maplewood was one of the few municipalities in New Jersey that imposed a COVID-19 mandate. The state didn’t mandate it.” Both submitted religious exemptions but were denied, leading to what Coyle calls a “Stalinist show trial” that “violated every possible rule of due process or even known policies.”

The trial was a farce: “They were supposed to have a trial by three chiefs. Instead, they were tried by the business administrator who denied them in the first place. They were denied the right to call witnesses. The town declined to present any witnesses, didn’t respond to discovery, and presented no testimony except the business administrator who said, this is what happened. And we said, can we question you? And he said, no.”

Kennedy draws parallels to similar injustices in California: “What you’re describing is what happened right here in the city of Los Angeles with what we call the sham boards of rights, where they put these firefighters on trial, basically didn’t let them bring evidence.”

After a four-year battle across multiple legal fronts, including the Public Employee Relations Commission and federal court, the firefighters prevailed. Maplewood was forced to restore full back pay to 25 years, provide full retirement pensions, and pay over $1.25 million in settlement. Coyle notes the hypocrisy: “Maplewood granted medical exemptions for firefighters and police officers and they fired these two people saying they couldn’t possibly be accommodated.” He highlights the absurdity, pointing out that neighboring departments without mandates shared resources, making the safety claims untenable.

The discussion dives into the landmark Supreme Court case Groff v. DeJoy, which raised the bar for employers claiming “undue hardship” in religious accommodation cases. Coyle shares how it’s shifting the tide: “Groff was a reversal from the Third Circuit... undue burden means undue in the course of the business and burden as in something outside of anything normally expected by the business.”

Yet challenges remain. Kennedy laments disparities between circuits: “We’re seeing in the Ninth Circuit is they are ignoring Groff when it comes to COVID, quote, vaccination.” Coyle emphasizes the bigger picture: “This isn’t about COVID. This is about COVID, but it isn’t about COVID. The rights that are being taken from everybody and the normalization of discrimination can’t be allowed to continue.”

The human cost is profound. Giordano had to sell his house and relocate, while both men endured financial and emotional strain. Coyle praises their resolve: “These two brave firefighters... stuck to it and said, we’re going to make this as best we can.”

As public sentiment evolves, Coyle sees hope: “The further you got away from COVID, it started slowly sinking in that, like, maybe we’re lying... I think in the next year two years we are going to see all this cemented and walked back.”

Don’t miss this riveting conversation on religious rights, legal strategies, and the ongoing battle against mandate overreach. Tune in to the full podcast on BrokenTruth.TV for more insights from these warriors for truth. Merry Christmas—may this victory inspire us all.