The episode features Arizona attorney Ryan Heath of The Gavel Project and California attorney Jeremy Friedman, discussing a landmark student free speech case currently headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The conversation underscores the ongoing mission Warner championed: defending constitutional rights, exposing government overreach, and connecting attorneys in the fight for medical freedom and due process.

Warner Mendenhall: A Life Devoted to Accountability and Freedom

Warner Mendenhall was a tireless advocate for ordinary citizens against government abuses, corporate fraud, and the erosion of constitutional liberties. A politically active Ohioan, he served two terms on the Akron City Council in the early 1990s, where frustration with the city law department’s responses to constituent concerns prompted him to attend law school. He earned his J.D. from the University of Akron (after a B.A. from the same institution and an M.A. from Kent State University) and was licensed to practice in the late 1990s.

His early legal victories included exposing block grant fraud and successfully defending charter amendments in Akron—cases that solidified his calling as a mission-driven attorney. Warner founded the Mendenhall Law Group (with offices in Akron, Ohio, and Boston, Massachusetts), building a practice focused on holding governments and corporations accountable.

His areas of expertise included the False Claims Act (qui tam/whistleblower litigation involving Medicare, Medicaid, defense contracting, and federal grant fraud), municipal law, eminent domain and property law, personal injury, bankruptcy, criminal defense, and small business matters. He was admitted to practice before the Ohio Supreme Court, multiple federal district and circuit courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court.Warner’s work gained national prominence during the COVID-19 era. He represented whistleblowers challenging mandates and hospital protocols, often pro bono. Notably, he served as counsel for Brook Jackson in her high-profile lawsuit against Pfizer, alleging irregularities in the company’s COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. He also litigated multiple cases against Ohio public universities over COVID shot mandates and other matters involving medical freedom and informed consent.

In 2023, following the COVID Litigation Conference in Atlanta (sponsored by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation and his own firm), Warner founded Freedom Counsel. The organization serves as a vital network connecting hundreds of attorneys, medical professionals, scientists, and citizens dedicated to fighting mandates, shutdowns, medical interference, dangerous hospital protocols, vaccine-related issues, data manipulation, and broader attacks on personal rights and liberties. Its mission aligns closely with Warner’s lifelong passion: educating the public, elevating important cases, and empowering individuals denied due process and constitutional protections. Warner co-hosted the Broken Truth / Freedom Counsel Podcast, where he brought his sharp legal insight, cowboy-like willingness to “throw punches” for justice (as John Davidson fondly recalled), and deep commitment to the rule of law. Tributes following his passing—from U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, Brook Jackson, and many others—highlighted him as a fearless champion for medical freedom, the vaccine-injured, and constitutional principles. He built coalitions, mentored attorneys, and continued strategizing legal resources even in his final days.

The Ryan Heath Interview: Misuse of Anti-SLAPP Laws and a Student’s Fight for Free Speech

The episode shifts focus to a compelling case that Warner personally championed as lead counsel for the U.S. Supreme Court proceedings: G.W. v. Coronado Unified School District, et al. Ryan Heath (Arizona attorney and founder of the nonprofit Gavel Project) and co-counsel Tracy Henderson (California attorney) represent the plaintiff—a brave young woman who, as a teenager in early 2022 at Coronado High School (a performing arts school on Coronado Island in San Diego), protested the lingering mask mandates through expressive conduct.

The student would enter class, politely remove her mask, and refuse to leave, clearly conveying her disagreement with the policy. In response, over six weeks, teachers allegedly humiliated her, alienated her from classmates, kicked her out of class, denied her learning materials and the opportunity to take tests with peers, and even moved entire classes to different rooms to avoid her. She missed approximately one-third of the academic year. During a lockdown drill, she was isolated alone in an unlocked bathroom—described as a potential “fish in a barrel” scenario. Ryan Heath detailed how the school’s actions amounted to viewpoint discrimination and compelled orthodoxy, violating core First Amendment principles established in cases like Tinker v. Des Moines and West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette.

The lawsuit, filed in San Diego Superior Court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (and including a California Bane Act claim for interference with civil rights by intimidation or threats), alleged expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. The student was not disruptive, posed no danger to others, and was exercising her right to dissent peacefully. The complaint also named over 20 individual defendants alongside the school district.In a shocking turn, the school district and individual defendants filed four anti-SLAPP motions (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation under California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16). They argued that their own actions—punishing and silencing the student’s dissent—constituted protected free speech. The trial court granted the motions, crediting the defendants’ affidavits over the plaintiff’s sworn statements and ruling that the conduct was protected “as a matter of law” without identifying specific protected statements or actions. The California Court of Appeal (Fourth District) affirmed, skipping the required two-prong analysis: defendants failed to meet their initial burden of showing the suit arose from protected activity on a matter of public interest, yet the burden improperly shifted to the plaintiff. This led to significant attorney fee awards against the young plaintiff (now in her early 20s and a college graduate), currently in the low six figures with ongoing appeals. Co-counsel Tracy Henderson faced sanctions of $13,000 personally, a requirement to take a class, and a bar report for challenging jurisdiction in a subsequent appeal—actions Ryan Heath and Jeremy Friedman described as retaliatory.

The case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court via petition for writ of certiorari. Procedural complications have arisen because Tracy Henderson was not initially listed on the appellate caption despite her direct interest; the SCOTUS clerk requires clarification. The team filed a petition for writ of mandate in the California Supreme Court to correct this clerical issue before a June 19 deadline, with plans for potential sticker amendments or refiling if needed. Robert Barnes has signed on pro bono, and there is hope he will assume a lead role.

Jeremy Friedman, a California attorney and friend of Warner’s, provided expert analysis on the anti-SLAPP statute’s original purpose: protecting citizens from baseless “lawfare” suits that chill First Amendment activity by draining resources. Here, the law was allegedly inverted—used as a sword by the government to punish dissent and award fees to the powerful. Both attorneys stressed the dangerous precedent: if punishing viewpoint discrimination can be reframed as protected government speech, it could eviscerate civil rights claims nationwide (e.g., against police or other officials enforcing policies).

Ryan Heath shared his broader work through The Gavel Project, including teaching students civil disobedience modeled on Rosa Parks, leading protests across California, and filing related lawsuits. He worked alongside Warner on other matters, including a successful Arizona case for Dr. Lee Vliet and Truth For Health. He described Warner as a mentor and dear friend whose loss is devastating, especially as lead counsel on this SCOTUS effort.

View court briefs here.

Petition

237KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Appendix

601KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

The Fight Continues

Throughout the episode, the tone was one of grief mixed with resolve. John Davidson, Ryan Heath, and Jeremy Friedman all affirmed that Warner would want the movement to press forward. The case highlights critical issues: the proper application of anti-SLAPP laws, protection of student expressive conduct in schools, and the need for higher courts to correct lower-court errors that undermine constitutional rights.Warner Mendenhall’s legacy endures through Freedom Counsel’s network, the cases he elevated, and the attorneys he inspired. As the podcast continues, it carries forward his commitment to truth, accountability, and liberty.

For those wishing to support Freedom Counsel’s work or learn more about the ongoing legal efforts, visit freedomcounsel.org. The battle for constitutional principles does not end—it evolves, strengthened by the foundation Warner helped build.

Rest in peace, Warner. Your work lives on.

The session brought together oncologists, scientists, and a cervical cancer survivor. Johnson opened by recounting how he first connected with witnesses like Dr. Sabine Hazen during the pandemic, when she described FDA-supported research being undermined. He criticized pharmaceutical industry influence over media, regulators, medical organizations, and journals, and pointed to safety studies on genotoxicity and carcinogenicity that were never completed before the shots received emergency authorization.

Ranking Member Sen. Richard Blumenthal pushed back, quoting the National Cancer Institute’s conclusion that there is no evidence the vaccines cause cancer, lead to recurrence, or speed up disease progression. He stressed the importance of cancer research funding and warned that questioning vaccines could harm public trust and immunization rates.

Witness Accounts

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a veteran oncologist known for immunotherapy work, described seeing long-stable melanoma patients relapse weeks after receiving boosters. He observed similar patterns in other cancers, including aggressive colorectal cases in younger adults. Dalgleish pointed to T-cell exhaustion, immune tolerance, and multiple ways mRNA might interfere with tumor suppressor systems.

Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, a p53 tumor suppressor expert, explained how spike protein from the virus or vaccine may impair the body’s key cancer defense mechanisms. He compiled reports of over 300 post-vaccination cancer cases from 27 countries, some showing spike protein inside tumors.

Dr. Saskia Mostert presented findings from her team’s analysis of excess deaths across Western countries. Their BMJ Public Health paper documented more than 3 million excess deaths between 2020 and 2022. She faced professional repercussions, including an institutional investigation and eventual resignation.

Dr. Sabine Hazen, a gastroenterologist and microbiome researcher, detailed several retracted studies on COVID in patient stool samples, early treatment protocols, and vaccine effects on beneficial gut bacteria like bifidobacteria.

Dr. Asim Malhotra, a British cardiologist, recounted his healthy father’s death from cardiac arrest shortly after Pfizer vaccination. He called for halting the shots.

Defense of Current Position

Dr. Julie Gralow, Chief Medical Officer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, maintained there is no solid clinical evidence linking mRNA COVID vaccines to new or faster-growing cancers. She highlighted benefits for cancer patients facing COVID risks and the potential of mRNA platforms for future cancer therapies.

During questioning, Johnson exposed gaps in Gralow’s understanding of the specific mRNA technology used. She initially stated that the mRNA degrades rapidly and believed the injection largely stayed in the arm. Johnson pressed her on the modified pseudouridine that prevents rapid degradation, lipid nanoparticle biodistribution throughout the body (including organs), persistent circulation of spike protein and mRNA, and DNA contamination concerns. Gralow acknowledged the need for more research on several points.

Tamika Felder, a 25-year cervical cancer survivor and advocate, shared her personal story and emphasized the success of HPV vaccines in preventing certain cancers. She agreed with Johnson that cancer patients would want to know if any environmental factor, drug, or vaccine could increase their cancer risk.

Lively Exchanges and Challenges to the Narrative

The later portion of the hearing turned into a pointed back-and-forth. Johnson challenged Gralow on the modified pseudouridine in the mRNA, its persistence in the body far beyond initial claims, biodistribution beyond the injection site (citing rat studies showing accumulation in organs), and reports of DNA contamination in the vials. Gralow acknowledged the need for further research but maintained that large population data showed no overall cancer increase.

Witnesses described clinical observations of hyperprogressive cancers and spike protein appearing in tumor tissue — something El-Deiry called completely unexpected and worthy of urgent study. Dalgleish noted coroners refused to test tumors for spike despite requests.

Multiple witnesses detailed sustained attacks on their work. El-Deiry described how his publications faced relentless campaigns on PubPeer, a platform originally meant for spotting fraud but now often used anonymously to harass researchers challenging mainstream views. He said the attacks intensified after his HHS service and publication of cancer case reports, with no findings of misconduct yet ongoing reputational damage. Johnson referred to the site as “Pub Smear” and entered a detailed blog post documenting El-Deiry’s experience into the record.

Hazen recounted papers passing rigorous peer review only to be retracted later over minor issues, sometimes by critics with competing patents. Mostert and Malhotra echoed the pattern of institutional retaliation, leaked investigations, and career threats. Dalgleish highlighted rejected papers on virus origins with the exact same phrasing from multiple journals: “not in the public interest.”

Johnson also questioned reliance on modeling studies claiming millions of lives saved, presenting actual U.S. death data that contradicted them, and criticized FDA’s VAERS algorithm that senior officials were warned would hide safety signals like sudden deaths. He contrasted this with the retracted Surgisphere study that undermined early treatments like hydroxychloroquine.

The discussion touched on informed consent failures, the first-time use of pseudouridine-modified mRNA in humans, barriers to autopsies and tumor testing, and the need for merged registries. Witnesses called for open scientific debate without fear of professional destruction.

Closing Thoughts

Johnson described the hearing as part of a larger effort to confront how science and policy operated during the pandemic and restore public trust. He kept the record open for additional submissions through June 18, 2026.

The full transcript and video are available through Senate records and BrokenTruthTV coverage.

Get more from Broken Truth in the Substack app

Available for iOS and Android

Get the app

Dr. Hazan, founder and CEO of ProgenaBiome, a genetic sequencing research laboratory in Ventura, California, brings decades of experience as a clinician and investigator. A 1992 graduate of Dalhousie University, she has led numerous clinical trials and pioneered research linking gut bacteria—particularly Bifidobacterium—to disease outcomes, including COVID-19 severity.

During the interview, Dr. Hazan shares insights from her groundbreaking work, which was among the first to detect SARS-CoV-2 in fecal samples via whole genome sequencing. Her research highlights how disruptions in the gut microbiome may influence susceptibility to infection and overall immune response. She discusses observations of microbiome changes following COVID-19 infection and interventions, emphasizing the potential importance of maintaining beneficial bacteria for health resilience.

The episode explores challenges in scientific research during the pandemic, including difficulties in publishing findings that diverged from dominant narratives, as well as the promise of microbiome-focused approaches to understanding and addressing complex health issues.

Watch Dr Sabine Hazan in this clip from “Epidemic of Fraud”.

A Timely Conversation Ahead of Senate Testimony

This Freedom Counsel interview is particularly significant as Dr. Sabine Hazan is scheduled to testify tomorrow, June 3, 2026, before the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The hearing, titled “Plausible Mechanisms of COVID-19 Injections Causing Cancer and Attacks on Scientific Publications,” will examine potential links between COVID-19 vaccines and cancer mechanisms, alongside issues of scientific censorship and publication interference.

Dr. Hazan will appear on Panel I alongside other experts, contributing her microbiome expertise to discussions on these critical public health questions. Her testimony is expected to shed light on research findings, potential biological pathways, and the importance of open scientific inquiry.

Why This Matters

Freedom Counsel continues BrokenTruth.TV’s commitment to hosting honest conversations on topics often sidelined in mainstream discourse. John Davidson’s interview with Dr. Hazan provides viewers with expert perspectives on gut health, immunity, and the need for transparent science—especially relevant as Congress examines long-term impacts of pandemic policies.

Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Dr. Hazan’s full discussion. With her Senate appearance tomorrow, this episode offers essential context for understanding the stakes in ongoing investigations into COVID-19 science and policy.

Haviland has conducted multiple surveys on the topic and collaborated with scientists to investigate the composition and possible causes of these clots.

Origins of the Research

The discussion referenced the 2022 documentary Died Suddenly, in which several embalmers reported finding unusual white, fibrous structures in the veins and arteries of deceased individuals, beginning around mid-2021. Haviland contacted the Ohio Embalmers Association shortly after viewing the film. The association’s president, Woody Wilson, confirmed observing similar clots, which led Haviland to launch formal surveys.

These surveys expanded from the United States to several other countries, including Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. According to Haviland’s 2024 survey results, 83% of the 301 embalmers who responded (250 individuals) reported seeing the white fibrous clots, with an average occurrence in approximately 27% of the bodies they handled.

Scientific Analysis and Proposed Mechanism

Haviland is working with a team that includes retired polymer chemist Greg Harrison in Australia and neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCarron in Japan. Their analysis suggests the clots may involve an interaction between the body’s fibrinogen (a natural clotting protein), the spike protein associated with COVID-19 vaccines, and the phospholipid nanoparticles used in mRNA vaccines.

Testing conducted on clot samples has included:

• Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), which showed low levels of iron, potassium, and magnesium compared to typical blood clots, but elevated levels of phosphorus, sulfur, and occasionally tin.

• High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), which indicated unusual ratios of fibrinogen chains (approximately 9:4:1 for beta, gamma, and alpha chains, versus the normal 1:1:1 ratio).

Haviland noted that these findings differ from standard fibrin clots and drew a comparison to “white clot syndrome” observed decades ago in connection with certain heparin formulations.

Reports from Living Patients

Haviland also described contact with Dr. Basharat, a cardiologist and endovascular specialist in Jacksonville, Florida. According to Haviland, Dr. Basharat reported removing similar white fibrous clots from living patients in his catheterization lab over a period of several years. Communication with the physician later ended after he cited instructions from hospital administration to cease discussion of the matter.

Update from Tennessee

In June 2025, Haviland spoke at the Tennessee Funeral Directors Association annual convention at the invitation of then-president Taylor Moore. During the presentation, 18 out of 28 embalmers indicated by show of hands that they had observed the white fibrous clots in the first half of 2025. A survey conducted at the event reported the clots appearing in roughly 17% of cases, along with instances of microclotting in smaller blood vessels.

Haviland suggested that such microclots could potentially contribute to symptoms such as reduced oxygen exchange and related health issues, though he emphasized this as part of ongoing discussion.

Response from Health Authorities

Haviland stated that his outreach to the FDA and CDC over the past three years has not produced substantive responses. He also noted that many embalmers and medical professionals have been reluctant to discuss the phenomenon publicly.

Additional Resources

For more information on Haviland’s surveys and related research, he directed viewers to the Clotastrophe Substack, managed by Laura Kasner.

Clotastrophe

The white fibrous clots that embalmers have been finding in the deceased

By Laura Kasner

The full interview is available on the Broken Truth YouTube channel and Rumble. The topic remains a subject of continued investigation and debate within parts of the medical and research communities.

In 1997 I started working at CNN. I began as an intern but eventually went up the ranks of CNN from video journalist to ultimately becoming a video editor. The experience was incredible in many ways. I was able to work with extremely talented people and was exposed to a variety of other young minds from many walks of life. At the time, I believed we cared about the news and wanted to get it right.

When I started, the network had been in a hiring freeze due to a merger with Time Warner. This began a series of hot potato mergers of Turner Broadcasting with AOL taking over, then the AOL collapse changed the company back to Time Warner, then AT&T, and lastly Discovery took control.

Throughout the years these mergers caused distress, with more and more layoffs as the world of news reporting changed. There are very few left in the network from my era. The network is even less recognizable from what it once was.

My frustration and disappointment with CNN and other ‘mainstream’ news over it’s COVID coverage resulted in the production of my film “Epidemic of Fraud.” The lack of available networks or platforms willing to release my film has only exacerbated my disappointment in the state of media. Many of these networks and platforms were my clients during my 20+ year Hollywood career.

Now there is a new purchase taking place, and unlike the others, this one could hit CNN like a freight train.

Enter Paramount

The $110 billion Paramount Skydance acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery places CNN, HBO, Warner Bros. studios, and a vast archive of internal communications under the control of David Ellison — a leader increasingly seen as conservative-leaning and committed to appealing to the broad American center. This deal marks a historic break: for the first time, CNN will be owned by someone without significant ties to the DNC establishment. Past owners and leaders maintained deep Democratic connections that shaped the network’s editorial direction.

Previous Ownership: Entrenched DNC Influence

Under Warner Bros. Discovery, CEO David Zaslav hosted high-profile Democrats at his Hamptons home, including Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer at star-studded parties alongside celebrities. Zaslav’s public alignment with Democratic figures reinforced perceptions of CNN as an extension of party messaging.

Before the 2022 WarnerMedia-Discovery merger, AT&T owned WarnerMedia (and thus CNN). AT&T’s board chairman was William E. Kennard, a former FCC chairman under Bill Clinton and Obama’s Ambassador to the EU. Kennard served on the Operating Executive Board of Staple Street Capital, the private equity firm that acquired a controlling stake in Dominion Voting Systems in 2018. This link raised serious conflict-of-interest questions.

This conflict is even more curious as Kennard was elected chairman of AT&T’s Board of Directors on November 6, 2020, exactly ONE DAY before CNN declared Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential election.

Echoes of Twitter: Ellison Should Release the “CNN Files”

Just as Elon Musk inherited Twitter and called it “both a social media company and a crime scene,” Ellison now controls WBD’s emails, Slack messages, editorial notes, and decision logs. Musk released the Twitter Files, exposing government collusion and censorship. Ellison faces a parallel — and perhaps greater — responsibility: authorize the full release of the CNN Files.

Decades of Narrative-Driven Reporting

CNN’s alleged collusion extends far beyond COVID. A consistent pattern of rushing to judgment on stories that fit progressive narratives, followed by quiet corrections or lawsuits, has eroded trust. Key examples include:

• Russia Collusion Narrative (2016–2019): CNN heavily promoted the Trump campaign’s alleged coordination with Russia, relying on the Steele dossier (later discredited). Years of breathless coverage contributed to national division before the Mueller report found insufficient evidence of conspiracy. More recently, an internal investigation by DNI head Tulsi Gabbard (and former DNC presidential candidate) stated: “The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.” CNN repeatedly was critical of Gabbard’s evidence with no neutral or positive framing appearing in its coverage of these revelations.

• Hunter Biden Laptop Suppression (2020): CNN dismissed the New York Post story as potential “Russian disinformation,” echoing a letter from 51 former intelligence officials. The laptop was later authenticated. This occurred weeks before the 2020 election.

• Jussie Smollett Hate Crime Hoax (2019): CNN embraced actor Jussie Smollett’s claim of a racist MAGA attack as emblematic of systemic racism. When evidence showed he staged it, Smollett was convicted — exposing uncritical reporting that advanced a preferred racial narrative.

• Covington Catholic Incident (2019): Initial coverage portrayed MAGA-hat-wearing students as aggressors harassing a Native American elder. Full video revealed a more nuanced story, leading to a defamation settlement by CNN with student Nick Sandmann.

• Kyle Rittenhouse Case (2020): CNN described Rittenhouse as a “vigilante” with racial motivations. After his acquittal on self-defense grounds, coverage faced sharp criticism for downplaying exculpatory evidence.

Additional patterns include alarmist climate coverage with limited dissenting voices, disproportionately negative Trump framing (documented by media watchdogs), and inconsistent Israel-Gaza reporting that has drawn internal and external accusations of bias from multiple directions.

COVID Collusion: HCQ Smears, Lab-Leak Suppression, the “Bat Market” Hoax — and Fauci as Untouchable Hero

CNN relentlessly attacked hydroxychloroquine as dangerous “Trump medicine,” amplifying the fraudulent Surgisphere study in The Lancet and NEJM (later retracted). The documentary Epidemic of Fraud exposed how media embraced these fake studies to suppress early treatments. CNN also pushed the natural-origin theory while marginalizing lab-leak evidence, aligning with official messaging.

Throughout the pandemic, CNN platformed Dr. Anthony Fauci as a heroic, almost saintly figure — a calm, infallible leader whose guidance “could not be questioned.” The network frequently portrayed him as the nation’s trusted voice of science amid chaos, running glowing segments, town halls, and interviews that elevated him to rock-star status. CNN covered Fauci merchandise like candles and socks, hosted multiple viewer Q&As with him alongside Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and framed criticism of Fauci as attacks on science itself. This hagiographic coverage contributed to a cult-like deference that discouraged scrutiny of shifting guidance on masks, origins, treatments, and lockdowns.

Last week, CNN invited Sen. Ron Johnson for an interview but abruptly canceled after he disclosed he planned to discuss internal documents showing public health officials’ cover-up of COVID vaccine harm. Johnson stated: “Not one major network has covered this story, and I was just invited to be on CNN yesterday, and I told them what I wanted to talk about, and they canceled the interview.” This incident underscores CNN’s ongoing reluctance to platform dissenting voices on pandemic-related issues.

Today’s Senate Testimony: CIA Whistleblower Confirms Cover-Up — and Ron Johnson’s Demand for Coverage

On May 13, 2026, former CIA operations officer James Erdman III testified before the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee. He stated: “Intelligence community leaders and senior analysts downplayed the possibility that the COVID pandemic originated as the result of a lab incident. Intentional or not, the IC’s actions resulted in a cover-up.”

Erdman highlighted Fauci’s alleged role in overriding analyst consensus favoring lab origin. During the hearing, Sen. Ron Johnson pressed for accountability and demanded that major news networks — including CNN — give the issues like COVID-19 vaccine injuries the coverage it deserves.

CNN’s amplification of official lines while dismissing dissent — and its recent cancellation of Johnson’s interview — now demands full review through the merged entity’s archives.

In a surprise to no one, a visit to CNN today shows no reference of Today’s senate whistleblower hearing. Fox News is showing the hearing (which was skipped by all Democrat senators on the committee) on the front page.

Release the CNN Files

Paramount under Ellison risks the same resistance Musk faced — lawsuits, leaks, sabotage, and hysteria labeling transparency “partisan.” Yet opening the books restored credibility for X and further provided a platform that whistleblowers and those harmed by COVID countermeasures were denied for far too long.

Ellison should release the CNN Files. Publish the emails, memos, and threads showing coordination with politicians, officials, and scientists across Russia, Hunter Biden, COVID, elections, and more. This ownership shift — free of prior DNC-linked structures — makes it possible.

• Transparency Wins: Disclosure rebuilds trust more than vague reforms.

• Content Reset: Financial synergies may bring cuts; editorial reckoning could restore balance.

• Public Interest: Decades of collusion eroded institutional faith. Sunlight disinfects.

The merger carries antitrust risks worth scrutiny. But the real danger was the prior unaccountable system intertwined with political and corporate interests. David Ellison holds the keys to a massive media “crime scene.” Open the files. Expose the collusion. Let the public judge — and heed calls like Sen. Johnson’s for real media accountability. This could become not just a corporate win, but a turning point for journalistic integrity.

More needs to be done, including reviewing the 2017 AP decision to change how ‘truth’ is subjectively reported. A release of CNN files would be an excellent place to start in restoring public trust.

In a decisive ruling that mainstream media has yet to acknowledge, a Nevada district court has fully dismissed all claims against Free Speech Foundation, Inc. d/b/a America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) in a high-profile wrongful death lawsuit (case file PDF’s at bottom of the article).

The case, Estate of Jeremy Parker et al. v. Medina Culver, D.O. et al., Case No. CV23-00219 (Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, Dept. 8), alleged that AFLDS bore responsibility for Jeremy Parker’s death after he obtained a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prescription through a third-party telemedicine referral listed on AFLDS’s informational website.

Dr. Simone Gold, physician, attorney, and founder of AFLDS, joined host John Davidson and co-host Jennifer Kennedy, Esq. of Freedom Counsel on BrokenTruth.TV to discuss the case, the evidence, institutional biases exposed during litigation, and the broader fight for medical freedom.

Background: A Case Amplified by Media and Politics

Jeremy Parker, 52, died suddenly on February 3, 2022, at a friend’s home in the Reno/Sparks area. His widow, Jelena Hatfield, and other family members filed suit, claiming a single therapeutic dose of HCQ — prescribed months earlier via telehealth — caused his death. The narrative was heavily promoted by The Intercept and Time Magazine, which linked the tragedy to AFLDS and “right-wing doctors” pushing repurposed COVID treatments.

Dr. Gold emphasized AFLDS’s limited role: the organization is a nonprofit focused on education, public information, essays, videos, and medical freedom advocacy. It never employed prescribing physicians, conducted telemedicine, maintained patient records, or owned telehealth platforms. It simply listed independent providers as resources for patients seeking awake doctors during a time when many physicians were restricted from early treatment options.

Court Rulings: Complete Dismissal With Prejudice

On August 29, 2025, the court held a hearing and later issued an Order Granting Defendant Free Speech Foundation, Inc. d/b/a America’s Frontline Doctors’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third-Amended Complaint With Prejudice. The court rejected claims of wrongful death, negligence, deceptive trade practices, and breach of contract against AFLDS.Key reasons included:

• No underlying tort or duty owed by AFLDS, a public information nonprofit.

• No viable vicarious liability (apparent authority) theory under Nevada law (NRS 41.085).

• Failure to comply with medical malpractice affidavit requirements (NRS 41A.071).

• Claims of negligent referral or supervision not recognized in Nevada.

• Lack of consideration or mutual assent for any alleged contract.

The dismissal with prejudice means the claims were so fundamentally deficient that no amendment could cure them — a strong judicial rejection.

A later Omnibus Order (addressing remaining issues) granted summary judgment to co-defendant Dr. Medina Culver, D.O., denied AFLDS’s request for attorney’s fees, and denied plaintiffs’ challenges to costs. Despite the complete victory on the merits, AFLDS was left bearing over $250,000 in defense costs after more than two years of litigation involving multiple experts (cardiologists, pathologists, and HCQ specialists) and repeated amended complaints.

The Fatal Flaws: Autopsy, Death Certificate, and Bias

The court filings and discovery highlighted glaring discrepancies:

• The autopsy documented dilated cardiomyopathy — a floppy, enlarged heart with high risk of sudden death, often linked to chronic alcohol use. This critical finding was omitted from the official death certificate.

• The death certificate, signed by Washoe County Medical Examiner Dr. Laura D. Knight, listed only: “Sudden Death In The Setting Of Therapeutic Use Of Hydroxychloroquine.”

• Parker received 10 tablets (2,000 mg total) in August 2021; his wife maintained he took only one. Blood levels were sub-therapeutic. HCQ experts confirmed a single 200 mg dose could not cause death.

• Emails between coroners revealed political skepticism toward HCQ and AFLDS, raising questions about scientific objectivity in a legal document with major financial and reputational consequences.

Plaintiffs’ expert evidence was weak compared to the defense’s high-caliber specialists. The prescribing physician’s motion for summary judgment was also granted, further underscoring the lack of causation.

Media Role and Ambulance-Chasing Allegations

Dr. Gold criticized The Intercept and Time for sloppy reporting that ignored basic facts: the prescription header showed a separate telehealth platform (not AFLDS), the prescription predated death by months, and AFLDS had no direct involvement. No reporters contacted AFLDS for comment. Attorney Luke Busby was described as continuing the case long after evidence showed it was meritless.

Why This Case Mattered

This lawsuit was part of a larger pattern: using tragedy to discredit safe, generic, decades-old medications like HCQ, intimidate early-treatment advocates, and chill free speech on medical issues. AFLDS’s survival and the with-prejudice dismissal represent a victory for truth over narrative.As Dr. Gold noted, defending the case drained significant resources from a modest nonprofit doing vital work — including amicus briefs supporting medical freedom cases at the U.S. Supreme Court on Emergency Use Authorization issues.

Listen to the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV for Dr. Gold’s detailed, unfiltered account, sworn testimony highlights, coroner emails, and discussion of ongoing medical freedom battles (including the upcoming GoldCare.com town hall on Hantavirus with Dr. Robert Malone).Court documents, including the dismissal order, Omnibus Order, and death certificate, are available below. Medical freedom depends on sunlight — this case shows what happens when politics overrides pathology and journalism skips due diligence. AFLDS continues the fight at AFLDS.org.

Cv23 00219 Ord

1.1MB ∙ PDF file

Download

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FREE SPEECH FOUNDATION, INC D/B/A AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD-AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

Download

Cv23 00219 Omnibus Ord

2.61MB ∙ PDF file

Download

OMNIBUS ORDER 1) GRANDING DEFENDANT MEDINA CULVER, D.O.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

Download

We teased this update on April 23rd during a visit to the latest court hearing in Milton, Florida, but now that it’s public knowledge, we are able to report it.

The Kenlee case received national attention when 3 now-removed DCF workers were caught on camera smirking and grinning during the abduction of Kenlee from her mother Joy under armed police oversight. Joy had concerns with a black-box warning drug that doctors wanted her daughter to take, resulting in the taking of the child before many of us got involved and raised attention to the family’s plight. The situation had become so twisted that, as of February, the state was attempting to terminate Joy’s parental rights and put Kenlee up for adoption.

OANN allowed me to share Joy and Kenlee’s story in February.

The case highlighted other significant cases with Florida’s DCF. We recently interviewed Tasha Patterson in her fight against medical kidnapping by the state after a hospital failed to diagnose a child with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome which caused bone fractures.

This case led to “Patterson’s Law”, allowing families to obtain additional medical review before DCF forcibly removes children from their parents. The bill is currently waiting on Governor Ron Desantis’s signature.

Human Rights attorney Leigh Dundas also brought to light another case involving child abuse in Florida.

We recently proposed Kenlee’s Law, encouraging reform in Florida’s DCF and a way to protect families from government overreach. Notably, the law would require recordings for all DCF interactions, transparency about state medical abductions, and remove qualified immunity for judges and government workers who commit fraud upon the court.

Learn about Kenlee's Law

We have been told the issues with Florida DCF have caused concern in the DeSantis administration and how it could affect his 2028 presidential aspirations.

While Kenlee has not been returned to her family, we applaud the state for making progress towards reunification.

Sign the petition to support Kenlee’s law today.

Sign to Support Kenlee's Law

This case is far more than one family’s tragedy. It directly inspired Patterson’s Law, a groundbreaking piece of Florida legislation designed to prevent similar injustices by guaranteeing families facing DCF allegations the right to a second medical opinion.

The Medical Beginnings: A High-Risk Pregnancy and Fragile Infants

Tasha’s twins were born prematurely at 34 weeks and 6 days via C-section. The pregnancy was complicated by preeclampsia, oligohydramnios (low amniotic fluid), breech presentation, and premature rupture of membranes. One twin spent 24 hours in the NICU; the other required two weeks due to breathing issues. After discharge, the infants were home for only six to seven weeks but showed persistent fussiness. Multiple doctor visits and ER trips attributed the symptoms to colic or reflux, with treatments like Pepcid and rice cereal in formula offering little relief.

During a late-night ER visit for the second twin, pressure marks from a Velcro swaddle prompted a full child abuse workup. Skeletal surveys revealed numerous fractures in both twins — ribs, metaphyseal injuries, and more. DCF immediately removed the children, law enforcement launched a criminal investigation, and Tasha was arrested in the street after being followed from her home. A relative gained temporary custody, but the family faced strictly supervised visitation.

Crucially, new fractures continued to appear even after removal — including while the twins were in the relative’s care under constant supervision and during a subsequent hospital stay. One relative described holding an infant who pushed against his chest, resulting in an audible “pop,” visible deformity, and a confirmed new fracture on X-ray. The baby did not cry, a key indicator of underlying bone fragility.

A Chorus of Expert Testimony: Metabolic Bone Disease and Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Tasha, a trained Nurse Practitioner, had suspected her own connective tissue issues prior to the births and was already pursuing genetic evaluation. Post-removal, the family assembled an extraordinary team of specialists whose findings were unanimous and compelling:

Dr. Marvin E. Miller, M.D., a leading expert in infant bone fragility, identified a perfect storm of risk factors for Metabolic Bone Disease (MBD): twin pregnancy (increased calcium demand), prematurity, maternal magnesium sulfate (used for preterm labor, which weakens fetal bones), antacids like Tums/Pepcid/Nexium (interfere with mineral absorption), oligohydramnios, and short umbilical cords limiting fetal movement and bone loading. He emphasized that fragility fractures in weakened bones occur with normal handling, lack associated bruising or severe internal thoracic injuries (unlike abusive fractures), and are transient, peaking in early infancy.

Dr. Anthony Perszyk, M.D., a Florida geneticist often consulted by child protection teams, clinically diagnosed Tasha with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (h-EDS) based on her Beighton score of 9/9, POTS, TMJ dysfunction, soft tissue injuries, GI issues, and pregnancy complications. He confirmed the twins also have the condition. Their abnormal bone matrix (due to defective collagen) predisposes to fractures during birth, NICU care, and routine infant handling. Perszyk noted genetic testing for h-EDS is frequently negative but does not negate the strong clinical diagnosis.

Dr. Michael Holick evaluated Tasha and raised clear concerns for h-EDS.

Dr. David Ayoub, collaborating with Dr. Miller on radiology, documented classic signs of healing rickets and MBD: craniotabes (soft skull spots), rachitic rosary (cupped ribs), subperiosteal new bone formation, ulnar cupping, and more. An early radiologist had noted decreased bone mineralization, only to issue a suspicious addendum reversing that finding.

Dr. Eli H. Newberger, M.D., founder of the Child Protection Team at Boston Children’s Hospital with six decades of experience diagnosing over 3,000 abuse cases, provided a detailed expert opinion supporting a medical etiology.

Dr. Gerard Pals, Ph.D., an international authority on Osteogenesis Imperfecta and rare bone diseases, reviewed imaging and determined that alleged “skull fractures” were actually congenital accessory sutures and ossification defects — common in bone fragility disorders but frequently misread by radiologists as trauma. Many rib fractures dated to the perinatal or NICU period.

The twins’ own treating geneticist later provided additional reports reinforcing a genetic/connective tissue disorder.

Legal Battles, Systemic Barriers, and Denied Justice

Despite this mountain of evidence, the dependency court limited testimony in the reopened termination trial to only two experts. The judge credited the state’s witness over the family’s specialists. Appeals, including to the Florida Supreme Court via habeas corpus, were denied — often within days and without full hearings. New evidence (injury dating, genetic findings, former CPT doctor urging reconsideration) was rejected as “reinterpretation” rather than “new.”

Valentina Villalobos highlighted procedural issues: parents advised to plead the Fifth in civil dependency cases (due to parallel criminal charges that never went to full trial), allowing judges to draw negative inferences; alleged conflicts with the presiding judge’s donations to involved hospitals (Joe DiMaggio); and broad immunities protecting Child Protection Teams and hospitals from accountability.

Tasha never received a full opportunity to testify. The emotional toll is profound: “This is harder than jail… These are my kids.” The twins, now receiving proper treatment for their condition, still cry for “Mommy Tasha” at the end of visits.

Patterson’s Law: Turning Personal Tragedy into Systemic Reform

Tasha’s case became the namesake and driving force behind Patterson’s Law, a critical reform addressing one of the most glaring failures in Florida’s child welfare system — the lack of access to independent medical expertise in abuse allegations.

The legislation ensures that parents facing DCF-related allegations involving medical child abuse or unexplained injuries have the statutory right to obtain a second medical opinion from a qualified specialist. It passed both the Florida Senate and House with strong bipartisan support and was awaiting the governor’s signature at the time of the interview (effective date July 1 following passage).

Patterson’s Law represents a vital safeguard. As John Davidson and the family noted, it acknowledges that rushed diagnoses — especially in complex premature infant or genetic cases — can destroy families without due process. It counters financial incentives in the system (federal Title IV-E funding tied to removals) and the tendency of some Child Protection Teams to “dig in” due to immunity protections.

Tasha and her advocates hope the law will not only help future families but exert moral and practical pressure on the judiciary and DCF to revisit cases like hers where truth and new evidence have been sidelined in favor of finality.

A Pattern of Overreach?

The interview touched on systemic issues: families losing children after seeking medical care for legitimate conditions, ignored exculpatory evidence, and the human cost when “finality supersedes the truth.” Tasha’s stepson (then 8) testified to a loving home with no violence — testimony disregarded. The relative who observed fractures under supervision also provided powerful testimony.

Freedom Council and similar organizations emphasize that while intervention is sometimes necessary, cases involving no prior history, no criminal record, and strong medical defenses deserve rigorous scrutiny — including second opinions now enabled by Patterson’s Law.

Current Status and How to Help

With appeals exhausted and adoption imminent, the family faces limited legal avenues but continues advocating. The twins remain with a relative and are receiving appropriate genetic care, yet the separation persists despite supervised visitation and clear medical exoneration.

Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Tasha, Valentina, and John Davidson in their own words.

Support the Patterson family and their legal efforts at: youarethepower.net/patterson

Join or support Freedom Council at freedomcouncil.org — attorneys helping attorneys fight these critical battles.

Tasha Patterson’s story is a testament to a mother’s love, medical truth prevailing against institutional resistance, and the power of persistence. Patterson’s Law stands as a beacon of reform born from profound loss. May it prevent other families from enduring the same nightmare — and may justice ultimately prevail for Tasha, Michael, and their twins.

View redacted files related to the case here.

Patterson Twins Miller Final Report (2) Redacted

524KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Perszyk Report (1) Redacted

1.99MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Miller Ayoub Radiology Findings (1) Redacted

4.17MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Pals Expert Report (2) Redacted

9.46MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Newberger Report Patterson (1) Redacted

192KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

“So I’m in a research group. You know, it’s a 501c3 and we have two projects, pilot projects that we’re trying to get funding for. It’s just impossible because it’s going to go against the narrative of safe and effective.”

This frustration echoes broader concerns in the medical community about institutional resistance to research that might challenge established public health positions, particularly around pregnancy and vaccination. Dr. Biss emphasizes that the barriers are not technical—”I don’t think so. It’s just getting it funded and then utilized”—but rather systemic and ideological. Her work aligns with a growing push for greater transparency and patient-centered data in women’s reproductive health. As a Senior Fellow with the Independent Medical Alliance and recently appointed to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Dr. Biss brings extensive clinical experience to national discussions on vaccine policy.

Freedom Counsel Context

Freedom Counsel, in partnership with BrokenTruth.TV, focuses on defending medical freedom, parental rights, and informed consent. This interview exemplifies their mission: amplifying voices of practicing physicians who prioritize patient safety and evidence over consensus. Dr. Biss’s insights come from hands-on care involving thousands of pregnancies, providing a grounded perspective amid polarized debates.

Looking Ahead

As Dr. Biss and her research collaborators seek support for their pilot projects, the interview serves as a call to action for donors, policymakers, and fellow clinicians committed to rigorous science without predetermined outcomes. John Davidson closes warmly: “Well, Dr. Kim Biss, thank you so much. It’s been a pleasure making friends with you, and I can’t wait to hang out with you again.” To which Dr. Biss replies, “Yeah, it’s been awesome.”

Watch the full Freedom Counsel interview on BrokenTruth.TV for deeper insights into Dr. Biss’s data on miscarriages, infertility trends, hormonal disruptions, and her vision for better protecting women’s health in an era of rapid medical innovation. This discussion underscores the need for open scientific dialogue—especially on topics as vital as pregnancy and early life. Freedom Counsel and BrokenTruth.TV remain dedicated to hosting these critical conversations.

In what can only be described as a reckless threat to public health, former CNN journalist John Davidson sat down with notorious anti-vaccine activist and part-time horse doctor Dr. Mary Bowden on the latest episode of Broken Truth.

What was supposed to be a serious interview quickly turned into an embarrassing display of Bowden dodging basic facts, refusing to apologize for her crimes against consensus, and somehow still sounding reasonable. Sources close to reality are concerned.

From the moment Davidson opened with the hard-hitting discussion about whether she starts every patient visit with a rectal exam, it was clear this would be no ordinary podcast. Bowden, clearly rattled, tried to clarify that she is in fact an otolaryngologist — a claim this program has not independently verified.

“If the vaccines were dangerous, CNN would have told us”

Davidson repeatedly pressed the Houston ear doctor on why she won’t just trust the real experts: Dr. Bill Gates, Dr. Peter Hotez, and Dr. (Esq.) Dorit Reiss. Bowden’s refusal to accept Bill Gates’ medical degree was particularly alarming.

At one point, the host heroically offered her oats. She asked for beef jerky. Typical.

Bowden also continued her bizarre conspiracy theory that a $26,000 judgment against her by the $13 billion “nonprofit” Houston Methodist Hospital somehow doesn’t count as losing. She further claimed — without evidence — that her medical license was never actually revoked. This reporter remains skeptical.

“Next question.”

When asked to define what a vaccine is, Davidson wisely pivoted. When confronted with the ironclad retracted LancetSurgisphere study that proved hydroxychloroquine was killing MAGA patients, Bowden muttered something about Harvard doctors getting in trouble. Classic deflection.

The low point came when Davidson courageously raised the OnlyFans pharmacist who bravely sounded the alarm early in the pandemic. Instead of taking career advice like a professional, Bowden declined. Some people just can’t be helped.

Final Verdict from People Who Matter

Dr. Bowden ended the interview by encouraging viewers to buy her book — which, according to our fact-checkers, does not come with crayons (yet). Davidson closed by congratulating her on her grift and reminding everyone he is definitely not thirst trap Mikki Willis.

Click here to know which book not to buy on amazon using this Amazon Associates link.

This program is deeply concerned that impressionable viewers might walk away thinking early treatment, informed consent, and mocking corporate media are acceptable. We urge you to watch the full episode immediately so you can help us ratio it in the comments.

BrokenTruth.TV: Still platforming dangerous questions in 2026. Think of the children.

At the IMA’s 2026 conference, focused on emerging trends in medicine, host John Davidson sat down with pathologist and Independent Medical Alliance Head of Medical and Scientific Affairs, Dr. Ryan Cole. The wide-ranging conversation touched on Dr. Cole’s ongoing fight for medical free speech, his deep dive into photobiomodulation (red light therapy), the hidden impacts of “junk light” and agricultural chemicals, and a return to nature’s basics for true wellness.

Dr. Cole, a board-certified pathologist with clinical experience in emergency rooms, urgent care, and family medicine, has long advocated for early treatment protocols and patient-centered care. He briefly served with America’s Frontline Doctors and faced intense scrutiny from the Washington Medical Commission for his public statements and prescribing practices during the COVID era. That disciplinary process, which restricted aspects of his license, now appears to be winding down. Dr. Cole expressed hope that a recent 8-1 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on free speech in medicine and therapy has prompted Washington regulators to reconsider their position. “The First Amendment matters. The Constitution matters,” he said, adding that he remains ready to fight to the end if needed.

Today, Dr. Cole leads policy and educational efforts for the IMA, including state and federal legislative work, visits to HHS, conferences, and webinars. He also balances life as an organic farmer in Idaho—raising vegetables, livestock, and tending 200 fruit trees—while keeping up with his six daughters. His mission is simple yet profound: help people reclaim health through straightforward, nature-aligned practices.

A Personal Introduction to Red Light Therapy

The discussion turned quickly to photobiomodulation, the topic of Dr. Cole’s conference presentation. His interest began with a personal injury three years ago: tearing his bicep tendon while throwing a bale of hay on his farm. His physical therapist predicted months of twice-weekly sessions. Skeptical but open, Dr. Cole encountered a red light device at a dinner in Toronto. After just 20 minutes, his pain dropped from 7/10 to 2/10, and his range of motion improved noticeably.

Doubting the placebo effect at first, the scientist in him dug deeper. He discovered the extensive photobiomodulation literature—roughly 10,000 published papers today, compiled in databases like that of Finnish researcher Vladimir Heiskanen. Mentors in the field include Harvard’s Michael Hamblin (now emeritus) and others exploring light’s effects on cellular repair.

“If light can heal a tendon, what else can it do?” Dr. Cole asked. The answer, he found, goes far beyond injury recovery. Modern society suffers from “junk light”—the blue-heavy spectrum of LEDs that replaced incandescent bulbs around 2020. Streetlights and household fixtures shifted to energy-efficient LEDs, but at what cost?

In nature, blue light never appears without balancing red and near-infrared wavelengths from sunlight. Incandescent bulbs once provided a fuller spectrum. LEDs and modern lighting disrupt circadian rhythms, sleep, mood, vision, endocrine function, and even raise cancer risks—particularly among night-shift workers. “We think we’re saving the planet with a light bulb,” Dr. Cole noted. “Only 6% of household energy goes to lighting. The rest powers compressors, air conditioners, and refrigerators. We’re starving our signaling pathways, messing with blood sugar and mood—all in the name of reductionism.”

He pointed to history: Danish physician Niels Ryberg Finsen won the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for using red light (via carbon arc lamps) to treat smallpox scarring and skin tuberculosis (lupus vulgaris). Medicine once embraced light therapy, then largely forgot it—perhaps because such modalities can’t easily be patented or monetized.

Dr. Cole emphasized the bigger picture: returning to natural light cycles. “Get up, meet the sunshine, set your body clock. Get real-world experience instead of living in a box with fake light all day.”

Glyphosate, the Microbiome, and “Death by Government”

The conversation shifted from light to what we put in our bodies. Dr. Cole runs a regenerative organic farm and has researched glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup and other herbicides. He noted that Monsanto patented glyphosate as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial in the early 2000s and again in 2010—before Bayer’s acquisition. It doesn’t just kill weeds; it disrupts soil bacteria, beneficial fungi, parasites, and the human gut microbiome.

“It also binds essential minerals needed for amino acids and proteins,” he explained. The result? Everyday meals deliver an unintended dose of antibiotic without consent, harming the microbiome that supports immunity, digestion, and overall health. “We wonder why everybody’s sick,” Dr. Cole said. “We’re poisoning our food, our light, our water (with fluoride), our air, and our medicines—then acting surprised at rising chronic illness, metabolic disorders, autoimmune conditions, and even gender confusion linked to endocrine disruptors like atrazine.”

He highlighted elevated Parkinson’s rates among farmers and golfers (heavy spray areas) and criticized efforts to grant agricultural chemical companies legal immunity similar to that for vaccines. On his own farm, weeds and pests exist, but nature finds balance. “Mother Nature is no fool. She knows what we need. We keep trying reductionist fixes and thinking we can do it better.”

The discussion led to medicine at a crossroads: increasingly “Orwellian” systems on one side versus open-minded groups like the IMA exploring overlooked therapies—including red light, DMSO, and chlorine dioxide—alongside fundamentals like real food and natural rhythms.

As a pathologist, Dr. Cole sees himself as “the observer at the scene of the crash,” reporting cellular-level damage (cancers, infections) while drawing on his clinical background to view the whole patient. “I understand the mechanisms, but I put that back into the picture of thinking like a clinician.”

Looking Ahead

Dr. Cole continues teaching, researching, and advocating through the IMA. He urged listeners to prioritize basics: sunlight, regenerative food, and awareness of environmental toxins.

To follow Dr. Ryan Cole’s work, connect with him on X at @DoctorCole (full: Dr. Cole spelled out) or on Substack at ryancolemd.substack.com.

The full interview is available on the Broken Truth podcast. As Dr. Cole and the IMA demonstrate, true progress in medicine may lie not in ever-more-complex interventions, but in remembering what nature has provided all along—and defending the freedom to discuss it openly.

The conversation centers on two major cases making national headlines. One features Children’s Health Defense and affected families suing the American Academy of Pediatrics under RICO statutes, alleging coordinated efforts that prioritize profits over children’s health. The second involves the AAP and allied groups challenging HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and recent ACIP reforms in federal court in Washington, D.C. CHD sought to intervene to ensure the real-world impacts on injured children and grieving families were heard.

Judge Brian Murphy’s recent preliminary injunction in Massachusetts has drawn intense scrutiny. It paused key changes to the ACIP process and vaccine recommendations, prompting appeals now heading to the First Circuit. Rosenberg details the credentials of the new ACIP members—including toxicologists, biostatisticians, and experts challenging the status quo—and contrasts them with past committees plagued by pharmaceutical conflicts of interest. She highlights how previous panels often approved additions to the schedule with minimal safety data on the cumulative effects.

The discussion dives deep into the broader crisis: America’s children face record chronic illness rates despite the highest healthcare spending. Rosenberg addresses the “customers for life” model she sees in pharmaceutical influence, the erosion of informed consent, and why families who lost children to alleged vaccine injuries deserve their day in court. She also touches on parallel free speech battles, including Supreme Court cases involving doctors’ rights to discuss treatment options.

Key moments include:

• Why one federal judge’s ruling has effectively halted major federal health policy shifts.

• The human cost behind the headlines—stories of families facing sudden infant deaths and ongoing investigations after following the schedule.

• The shocking financial incentives revealed in physician declarations opposing schedule changes.

• Optimism for appeals and the long-term fight to restore evidence-based, transparent decision-making at ACIP.

Rosenberg emphasizes that these cases go far beyond procedure: they concern whether science, safety testing of the full schedule, and parental rights will finally take precedence over entrenched interests.

Tune in to the full podcast episode on BrokenTruth.TV for the unfiltered conversation. As battles over vaccines, medical freedom, and government oversight intensify, this interview provides essential context on what’s at stake for American families.

Here is the exact segment from the film that lays it out (full transcript featured below):

Rep. Buddy Carter: “So was it because the president was encouraged by the use of this drug that you became discouraged by?”
Rick Bright: “Nothing to do with politics, sir.”

…
Narrator: “The idea to deny early treatment came from the FDA.”
…
“Rick Bright’s complaint continues: Implementing the EUA was a compromised position to rein in HHS leadership’s initial campaign to make the drug available to the public outside of a hospital setting…”

That phone call between Woodcock and Bright on March 24, 2020, is the smoking gun. Bright’s own sworn whistleblower complaint and congressional testimony confirm Woodcock pushed the restrictive EUA to block outpatient use. The film also notes Woodcock’s deep ties to the opioid crisis (she oversaw approvals of OxyContin and fentanyl) and her editorial role at the New England Journal of Medicine when it published the fraudulent Surgisphere study that torpedoed HCQ.

To let the full internal record speak — or to give Woodcock and Bright the chance to provide “context” — I filed a simple FOIA on November 2, 2023 (Control # 2023-9711):

All communications between Janet Woodcock (Janet.Woodcock@fda.hhs.gov) and Rick Bright at BARDA.

The FDA immediately acknowledged it as a “complex track” request. On the recorded call with FOIA Branch Chief Guruprasad Udapi, he told me straight: there were 1,100 requests ahead in the queue and I should expect “at least 24 months” before processing. No expedited treatment, even with public interest and congressional documents already public. We agreed to keep the request alive.

Full Phone Call Transcript with Guruprasad Udapi (November 2023) — Featured Here for the Record

[Full verbatim transcript embedded — the same call where Udapi confirms the 24-month minimum and states “all requests are treated the same.” Udapi also acknowledges that I wished to keep this request active.]

28 Months Later: Zero Progress, Zero Response, Still Listed in FDA’s Own Logs

It’s now March 31, 2026 — 28 months past filing. The FDA’s own February 2026 FOIA Received Log and FY 2024 log both still list #2023-9711 with no closure date, no partial release, and no indication of any processing whatsoever. It is exactly where Udapi said it would be: buried in the date-ordered queue.

On February 12, 2026, I emailed Udapi directly (CC’d to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.):

Email Request to Guruprasad Udapi: Foia Request No 20239711

99.4KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Mr. Udapi,
What is the status of this request for communications between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright?
We are now well over the two years you estimated it would take to obtain these records.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter.
John Davidson

No reply. Not a single word.

There is nowhere on any FDA portal showing movement on this request. The agency has simply gone radio silent.

What Are They Hiding?

Epidemic of Fraud already proved the collaboration existed through Bright’s whistleblower complaint, congressional records, and Woodcock’s own refusal to comment on biological-weapon defense uses of HCQ. The FOIA was filed to give the public the complete email chain — or to let Woodcock and Bright explain themselves.

Instead, the FDA has chosen 28 months of deliberate delay and non-response. Even with Secretary Kennedy now leading HHS and demanding transparency, the career bureaucrats at CDER’s FOIA office continue the cover-up.

This is not backlog. This is protection of the officials who shaped the “hospital-only” policy that contributed to unnecessary deaths while 52 other countries used HCQ successfully.

Watch the full segment from Epidemic of Fraud above — then ask yourself: If the FDA has nothing to hide, why has my FOIA been ignored for 28 months and still sits unprocessed in their own logs?

Woodcock is no longer with the FDA. She anounced her retirement 8 days after I told her my film was coming out. Rick Bright works at The Rockefeller Foundation as the Senior Vice President of Pandemic Prevention and Response. A role that is ironic since, according to Bright’s unsworn testimony to the House Committee he had never heard of hydroxychloroquine prior to 2020. Remember, HCQ was based on the first chemical compound ever used to treat an infectious disease. Hm.

The movie is available now on BrokenTruth.TV and EpidemicofFraud.com. The American people paid for these emails. We have waited long enough.

John Davidson
March 31, 2026

Acknowledgement Letter

66KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Transparency is not optional when the stakes were human lives. Demand the release of FOIA #2023-9711.

Watch the full film “Epidemic of Fraud” below.

Pasitney recounted how the nightmare started in December 2024. A handful of ostriches fell ill after contact with migratory birds. Two deceased birds tested positive for H5N1 via PCR by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). The agency — Canada’s equivalent of the USDA or FDA — ordered the immediate destruction of the entire flock under its rigid “stamping-out” policy. The birds? They were not poultry. They were ratites — a distinct family including ostriches, emus, and rheas — and the vast majority had already recovered. Many had natural antibodies from prior exposure dating back to 2020, creating what Pasitney called a “living laboratory” of herd immunity.

The family fought for 314 days, begging for live testing, offering expert witnesses, and pleading with the CFIA, courts, and even international voices like RFK Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz. They presented evidence that the flock posed zero risk: flightless birds, geographically isolated 135 km from any major city, on a farm dedicated to antibody research rather than meat or eggs. The CFIA refused. No onsite testing of survivors was allowed — their own policy threatened farmers with up to $200,000 fines per animal or six months in jail for attempting to test or treat. The agency even struck the family’s expert reports from judicial review.

Then came November 6–7, 2025. After the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear the final appeal, CFIA agents, backed by RCMP, turned the farm into a kill zone. Pasitney described it as “the most brutal possible way” — a theatrical display of force with unmarked marksmen, hay-bale kill pens, and high-capacity rounds that aerosolized blood and tissue across the property. Officially, 314 ostriches were culled. The family insists the body count in the field didn’t add up. They suspect many hens — the source of their prized antibody science — were quietly removed in the dead of night (2:30–4:30 a.m. operations behind the pens) for study. Left behind: blood-soaked straw bales, shell casings, unspent rounds, and discarded syringes. The family is now testing the syringe contents, believing the birds were being experimented on before execution.

Key Updates from the Interview

The fight didn’t end with the gunfire. Pasitney revealed major post-cull developments:

• Tribunal Victories and Fines: The family faced two $10,000 fines. They lost the first for allegedly failing to report the initial illness (despite phone logs showing they contacted vets immediately). But they won the second on a critical technicality: the CFIA improperly served quarantine documents by email instead of hand-delivering them with a proper risk assessment. The tribunal judge rejected the agency’s excuses — weather, protesters, lack of RCMP — noting they somehow mobilized hundreds of officers for the cull. Pasitney pointed out the absurdity: from February 26 to September 22, 2025, during the supposed “most virulent threat,” CFIA never conducted a single onsite visit after dropping off the improperly served papers in a plastic baggie.

• Posthumous Testing Bombshell: A longtime farm supporter secretly tested a bird after the cull. Result? Negative for active avian influenza — exactly as the family had claimed all along.

• Successful Treatment the CFIA Ignored: While barred from treating their own animals, the family used hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in the water at a 5% solution. Symptoms vanished across the flock. No more deaths. The CFIA showed zero interest in this low-cost, effective mitigation — even as it could have protected supply chains and trading partners.

• Evidence of Pre-Planned Cull: Shockingly, the local landfill was contacted in November 2024 — before any birds showed symptoms in December — about accepting ostrich carcasses. The CFIA had already lined up disposal before the outbreak was even confirmed.

• Science Theft Allegations: During one visit, CFIA agents asked where the family stored “COVID-19 antibodies.” In March 2025, the agency quietly granted funds to a Quebec lab to develop antibody diagnostic test kits — the exact innovation Universal Ostrich had offered using their recovered flock’s bloodwork. Pasitney believes their science made them a target: competition for Big Pharma and government-controlled solutions.

• Ongoing Legal Battle: Attorney Shane Dukas of Vernon, BC, is handling the case, with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) taking the constitutional portion. A compensation request has been pending for 2–3 months. The family is challenging search warrants, their own arrests (for feeding their animals after being “baited” to the back of the farm), Charter rights violations, and even the wrong address listed on every quarantine document — potentially rendering the entire quarantine illegal. They also discovered their bloodwork shows H5N1 antibodies, yet they remain healthy — further proof the virus is not the apocalyptic threat portrayed.

  

Get Tickets Now

Pasitney named the birds that were family: Peter (her mother’s protector), Q-tip (the tall, fuzzy-headed giant), Big Bear (always pacing for attention), Regretta (the bruising pecker), Annabelle, Colin (half-blind but full of life), and dozens more that trusted humans until the end. “They destroyed my mom’s identity,” she said. These were 20- to 35-year-old breeder stock, not six-month meat birds.

The interview painted a broader picture: misclassification of ratites as poultry, a “one-size-fits-all” policy that ignores science, and what Pasitney and the hosts described as part of a larger agenda — food control, genetic biodiversity loss, and the push toward lab-grown meat under the 2030 framework. “He who controls the food controls the people,” they noted. The cull wasn’t just about birds; it was about crushing independent farmers and independent science.

Public support was overwhelming and creative: a rental company demanded its vehicles back (loaded with kill materials), local businesses refused bobcats and tarps, and independent journalist Drea Humphrey of Rebel News provided boots-on-the-ground coverage that mainstream Canadian media (government-funded) largely ignored or spun.

Pasitney remains resolute: “We’re not giving up. The blood that was spilled will have justice.” The family is pursuing every legal avenue, calling for whistleblowers, and urging Canadians to wake up to emergency powers, unelected agency overreach, and the erosion of food security.

Watch the full interview on BrokenTruth.TV. This isn’t just one farm’s tragedy — it’s a warning. When government can execute healthy animals on suspicion alone, destroy livelihoods, and ignore science, no farmer — or citizen — is safe. Follow the ongoing legal battle and support the fight for accountability at Universal Ostrich Farms. The world was watching in November. The real question is: will it act now?

What begins as an introduction to her journey alongside her husband quickly unfolds into something far more intimate: revelations about surviving trauma, breaking free from fear-based manipulation during the COVID era, and why she now dedicates her life to helping trafficked and deeply wounded children reclaim their light.

Brianna opens up about her own dark path—growing up in a spiritually divided fundamentalist home, suppressing her intuitive gifts, and narrowly escaping life-threatening situations—before finding profound healing through spiritual work she and her husband pursued together. That inner transformation, she explains, shielded them both from the widespread fear and groupthink that gripped so many during lockdowns and beyond.

The discussion doesn’t shy away from tough topics: predatory systems targeting kids in education, medicine, and entertainment; the role of unresolved trauma in making societies vulnerable to control; Florida’s battles over health freedom, mandates, chemtrails, and CPS overreach; and the quiet revolution of homeschooling that restored joy and curiosity to her own children’s lives.

Embracing the Light

Humanity is experiencing an unprecedented awakening, and each of us has chosen to participate. We are witnessing a convergence of human understanding and divine expression that will ultimately lead to the ascension of humankind.

By Brianna Ladapo

She also shares glimpses into her clinic work—tackling chronic illness root causes with overlooked tools like high-dose melatonin and glutathione—and her optimism that today’s chaos is merely the painful death of an old, oppressive paradigm giving way to one built on community, truth, and love.

Brianna’s closing message is pure hope: “The best truly is yet to come. These are growing pains... We are entering the most beautiful and exciting time there’s ever been to be alive.”

Don’t miss this raw, inspiring interview. Tune in now on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Brianna Ladapo in her own words—then grab her book Emerging from Darkness: A Spiritual Memoir and Guide Back to the Light for the full story of one woman’s path from shadow to radiance. The conversation will leave you thinking, questioning, and perhaps ready to step into your own light.

Buy Brianna's Book

Tillman and Hovind, both long-time sufferers and advocates, share harrowing personal journeys that began with mysterious tick bites and spiraled into decades of misdiagnosis, ineffective treatments, and institutional denial. Tillman recounts her early encounter in the 1990s near Plum Island—a site long rumored to be a hub for biological research—where she experienced vertigo, joint issues, and immune system havoc. Hovind reveals how her quest for answers for her daughter’s congenital Lyme led her down a “rabbit hole” of suppressed science, including the failed Lymerix vaccine and its links to autoimmune chaos. Together, they paint a picture of Lyme as “the great imitator,” mimicking conditions like cancer, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s, while evading reliable detection due to flawed testing protocols.

Learn more at TruthCures

The conversation ignites with a nod to Dr. Robert Malone’s recent revelations. In a tweet and detailed Substack post titled “Declassified Documents Link U.S. Bioweapons Program to Lyme Disease Outbreak,” Malone leverages AI-driven analysis of declassified government files to spotlight the military’s role. He highlights how the U.S. released over 282,800 radioactive ticks in Lyme, Connecticut, and suppressed research on co-infections for 40 years, fueling the epidemic that now afflicts hundreds of thousands annually. This “recasting in a new light,” as Davidson puts it, amplifies calls for accountability in an era where parallels to COVID-19 gaslighting and doctor suppression are impossible to ignore.

Malone News

Declassified Documents Link U.S. Bioweapons Program to Lyme Disease Outbreak

Declassified Documents Link U.S. Bioweapons Program to Lyme Disease Outbreak…

Read more

3 months ago · 625 likes · 141 comments · Dr. Robert W. Malone

At the heart of the evidence lies a web of bioweapons research dating back to the Cold War. Declassified documents reveal experiments at Plum Island Animal Disease Center and Rocky Mountain Laboratories, where scientists like Willy Burgdorfer—credited with “discovering” the Lyme bacterium—force-fed ticks pathogenic mixtures to weaponize them. Burgdorfer’s lab notes, personal correspondence, and even a cryptic deathbed confession (”I wondered why somebody didn’t do something”) suggest deliberate engineering. The outbreak’s epicenter near these facilities, combined with suppressed co-infection studies and manipulated diagnostics, points to a man-made crisis designed to evade immune systems and profit Big Pharma through vaccines and tests—while leaving patients in limbo.

For a deeper dive into this history, check out Kris Newby’s investigative masterpiece, Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons, available on Amazon here. Newby’s work, referenced throughout the interview, exposes the tick experiments and government denials that Malone’s analysis builds upon.

Buy Now

As Mendenhall warns, this isn’t just history—it’s a blueprint for holding institutions accountable, from fraudulent testing to protecting innovative doctors. With echoes of Tuskegee and COVID, the panel calls for clinical diagnoses over rigged tests, extended treatments, and a reckoning at the CDC and FDA.

Don’t miss this eye-opening interview that challenges everything you thought you knew about Lyme. Watch now on BrokenTruth.TV and join the fight for truth and healing.

Just months ago, Warner was on death’s door. Diagnosed with aggressive stage 4C colon cancer that had spread to his peritoneum, he endured unbearable pain, severe dehydration, endless ER waits, and a traditional system that moved too slowly. “I could barely function,” Warner shares openly. But thanks to rapid intervention from Graith Care’s expert advocates — including home hydration infusions, quick-access medications, lab interpretation, appointment acceleration, and careful blending of traditional chemotherapy with supportive therapies — he’s now upright, improving daily, and back on camera smiling.

Warner credits Graith Care with pulling him back from the brink: “They got medication to my door faster than the hospital could. Home hydration revived me immediately. They helped track numbers, avoid dangerous interactions, and push for timely scans and treatments.” He emphasizes the daily struggle but also the hope — and the critical role of independent advocates who think outside rigid protocols.

Priscilla Romans, a veteran RN with decades in ICU, pediatrics, hospice, and insurance, founded Graith Care in March 2020 — right before lockdowns and mandates exposed even deeper cracks in healthcare. What began as a solo mission has grown into a nationwide (and international) team of handpicked advocates helping with everything from cancer navigation and hospital escapes during COVID to vaccine injury support, pediatric cases, labor/delivery advocacy, and nursing home issues.

Priscilla explains: “We’re like your trusted mechanic under the hood of healthcare — finding root causes, telling the truth, and fighting for options you deserve.” Graith Care matches clients to specialists (like integrative cancer experts, radiologists, pharmacists, and more), offers on-site hospital support when needed, teaches how to say “no” effectively, spots medical errors before they escalate, and blends natural/alternative approaches with traditional care safely.

The conversation doesn’t shy away from tough truths: hospital “standards of care” that can harm (Remdesivir nicknamed “Run Death Is Near,” Precedex/morphine combos, ventilation risks), insurance denials, polypharmacy dangers, pediatric coercion cases, and why independent advocates differ from hospital-employed ones who must follow system rules. Priscilla shares stories of preventing unnecessary intubations, uncovering sentinel events, and saving lives during COVID isolation.

Warner highlights Graith Care’s nonprofit arm, Graithful Giving, which funds donated advocacy for those in hardship — veterans, single parents, seniors, and others unable to pay out-of-pocket. (Services aren’t covered by insurance yet, though the trio discusses potential savings for insurers through early intervention and better outcomes.)This episode is more than a health update — it’s a wake-up call about taking control of your care, especially in crises. Warner’s gratitude is palpable: “I can’t thank them enough. This model is so important.”Watch the full emotional conversation now on Broken Truth channels. Visit GraithCare.com to book a free intake call, explore bundles of advocacy time (that never expire and cover your whole family), subscribe to their newsletter for proactive tips, or donate to help others in need.

Your health journey shouldn’t be a solo fight. When the system fails, who has your back?

For the last few years, many of us suspected someone was blocking our newsletters, messages, and websites from traffic across the internet. When we discussed it among our circles, it was a hypothetical idea that someone would take the time to create a detailed list of members of the medical freedom movement. We had all been censored by YouTube, Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc., but outside of those systems we didn’t have proof that there was something deeper going on across the internet.

We now have the proof.

As we have all learned, far too many people in tech space are raging leftists. And when I say raging leftists, I mean Google literally had cry-ins when Trump won 2016.

In November, I was searching Gibiru’s censored tab for ‘Broken Truth’, in order to find out if my site was being censored. The result was a document in GitHub, a website used by techy people to share code, try out apps, and more. Suddenly, I found an account by the user InfinityTec. The user had a section called ‘Blocklists’. Halfway down was a txt file called ‘MedicalPsuedoscience.txt’.

Opening the file revealed the following statement and disclaimer:

# A list to block medical pseudoscience sites.

# Sites that qualify meet one or more of the following qualifications: discouraging use of vaccines (such as calling them unsafe, sudden death/turbo cancer nonsense, linking them to autism, or made-up claims), homeopathy, chiropractic, quantum healing, supplements without evidence, chlorine dioxide (bleach) as a medicine, magical healing rocks, ivermectin/hydroxychloroquine for COVID, germ theory denial, fake and fraudulent medical journals (particularly ones on Beall’s List), etc. Some more general conspiracy theory sites have also made it onto this list.

# Sites that do NOT qualify include: government health information sites (this is despite the current state of some .gov sites), .edu sites (excluding those for institutions training in chiropractic or other pseudoscientific fields which are included in the list), popular/largely trusted news sites (IE Fox and CNN), social media sites OTHER than those created to bypass platform moderation or bans (for example, Rumble is a platform that is very friendly towards and promotes misinformation sources).

# Made by infinitytec and released under the MIT license.

# False positives? List issues? Domain submissions? Questions, comments, or suggestions? Please see https://github.com/infinitytec/blocklists/

# DISCLAIMERS: This list is provided as-is and is not guaranteed to be free of errors. This list is for informational purposes only and is not to be used in place of the information of qualified medical professionals. Most items were found by me, but sometimes I was clued into them by various other sites.

What I found in this list was sickening.

Infinitytec had compiled over 164,400 different websites he or she considered pseudoscience into a blacklist. This blacklist can be used to prevent any emails, links, texts, or any communication at all that comes from this server or even a message containing the name of the website. It’s a diabolical way to censor, and the senders and recipients have no idea it happened.

Search the List

This particular list included BrokenTruth.TV, BrokenTruth.com, my film EpidemicofFraud.com, and this person even tracked down my production company MagicFeatherInc.com and added it to the list as well. This was researched, targeted silencing. There were so many other names on this list as well.

• Gateway Pundit

• US Senator Ron Johnson

• Mikki Willis

• Vigilant Fox

• My Free Doctor

• The Wellness Company

• CPAC

• Just The News

• World Tribune

• Zerohedge

• Brownstone

• CHD

• Dr Drew

• YourNews

• Grace Schara

• Mendenhall Law Firm

• Robert Barnes Law firm

And literally thousands more.

I was shocked. Without thinking, I immediately fired off an email to the feedback of the account asking why I was blocked. I spend a tremendous amount of time sourcing everything in my work and movies, so to be targeted in this manner was a gut punch.

As Jesus said, ‘Do not cast pearls before swine’, so wasting any effort to try to reason with someone who compiled over 160,000 websites to block at the server level would definitely fit that bill. I told people on X what was happening. Several of my X friends discovered they had been blocked by this person, and they didn’t even know who it was!

Infinitytec on X

The GitHub account did list 2 additional contributors to the blocklist project.

UPDATE

I emailed Roen for a statement, and he replied with this.

Hi John,

I have contributed to the infinitytec/blocklists repository. However, I have not contributed to the development or content of the “medicalpseudoscience” blocklist.

As the project is maintained under Git version control, a transparent and complete record of all contributions is publicly available. You can review the changes I made here:
https://github.com/infinitytec/blocklists/pull/1/changes

Thanks,

Roen Wainscoat

The GitHub commit log does not show either of these people made edits directly to the misinformation pseudoscience list. However, since we are talking about a text file and not a complicated codebase, the text file could have been updated or edited outside of GitHub or via text, email, etc. All we can say for sure is that the GitHub track of the live file does not show either of these two people contributed to it. Remember, InfinityTec has not clarified which sources he used to compile this list, as he states:

It’s worth noting that the other named contributor to InfinityTec’s blocklists is a Christoph Daniel Miksche. Christoph’s previous work included The Digital Architects, a German firm whose clients included Rentschler Biopharma. Rentschler is a partner with Biontech and Pfizer.

Chrisoph maintains blocklists on his own, but his are functional, restricting ads, facebook trackers and not targeting people. These are the noble purposes that blocklists were designed for.

I leave this information in the article because anyone doing research into this based on the GitHub page may draw their own conclusions without perspective.

When pressed back in November, our InfinityTec ‘friend’ deleted many of his posts.

So what are these lists used for? Blocklists (also called blacklists, denylists, or RBLs/DNSBLs in some contexts) are lists of IP addresses, domains, email senders, or sometimes URLs that servers reference to automatically deny, filter, or restrict access or traffic from those sources.

In other words, if you don’t want information from a source to get through to your users, you use a blocklist.

Now, let’s say for the sake of argument that this was a list dedicated to science this person didn’t like. Then please explain to me what the MarcoPolo hunter biden laptop from hell expose site is doing on the list?

Who is InfinityTec3?

We don’t know. Some users claimed it was a company in Kansas called Infinity-ts., but after speaking with the owner (a libertarian) I do not believe that is the case. Who the person is is not as important as what his list uncovered. Our suspicions were correct, someone was intentionally preventing access to our work, and used the guise of science as a means to conceal crimes of the Biden family.

PLEASE DO NOT ATTACK INFINITY-TS - I don’t believe it’s them.

I beg my friends in congress and the US Military to ensure that this list, or a variation of it, is not being used on government servers and that this person and whomever he administrates servers for are not receiving a single tax dollar.

I wrapped up the situation with this statement.

I haven't bothered responding because there's not much point.
We had often suspected lists like this existed. It's different when you see it in real life, in scope and scale that is breathtaking. When you know the people involved who lost everything trying to speak out, when you've bled and cried with them, and someone chose to silence them with the click of a few keys because it shocked his world view...what am I supposed to say?

If Maddie's injury in the clinical trial had been public, maybe Ernesto's son would still be here. Maybe Trista Martin would still be here. Maybe we wouldn't be forced to sue the NIH for withholding evidence of knowledge of P53 suppression and the resulting cancers that come from that. Maybe a lot of things would be different.

But this isn't the world we live in.

It's all just disappointing. This person should have been on our side. Instead, he's just another cylon.

Now we know for sure it was done. At least we don't have to be paranoid about that anymore.

What a very sad state of affairs we are in. Lists like this might not appear in X source code, so if you’re still being throttled there, perhaps Elon needs to take a look at his lists as well.

If you feel your site was included in the list incorrectly, please email Infinitytec below.

Email Infinitytec

Gregga Gomez, an Iowa mother of a child diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF), fought—and ultimately won—a prolonged legal battle against the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS, formerly DHS) after being reported multiple times for alleged medical neglect. Her case, documented in court records from Polk County Juvenile Court (In the Interest of V.G.), highlights tensions between parental advocacy, specialized medical care, and state child welfare intervention. It shares striking similarities with the widely reported Florida case of Joy Zuraff and her daughter Kenlee, covered extensively by BrokenTruth.TV and FreeKenlee.com, where a CF child was removed amid disputes over treatment protocols.

Diagnosis and Early Conflicts

Vivian Gomez (referred to as V.G. in court documents) was born in 2020 and diagnosed with CF at five days old via newborn screening, confirming two Delta F508 mutations. Gomez and her husband quickly enrolled in care at the accredited CF clinic at Blank Children’s Hospital in Des Moines, one of Iowa’s two specialized centers.

From the outset, Gomez expressed concerns about the clinic’s recommendations. She advocated for dosing pancreatic enzymes based on fat grams in food (per Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines) to mimic natural release and minimize risks like fibrosing colonopathy, rather than fixed weight-based doses. She questioned aspects of care, including explanations of genetic testing and the necessity of certain interventions. Relationships strained with the clinic’s director, pediatric pulmonologist Dr. Alladdin Abosaida, who described the parents as “difficult” in depositions, noting a “broken relationship” despite efforts to repair it.

Repeated Reports and Removal

Gomez was reported to DHS four times by Dr. Abosaida between 2021 and 2022. Initial allegations included failure to provide adequate care, such as not filling prescriptions (e.g., Pulmozyme, a mucus-thinning nebulizer treatment) and non-compliance with therapies like vest use for airway clearance. Gomez countered that pharmacy supplies provided two-month quantities, leading to excess stock, and that she pursued alternatives like salt therapy (halo therapy) and naturopathic remedies for recurrent C. diff infections when standard treatments faltered.

In August 2022, during a hospitalization for respiratory issues and low BMI (exacerbated by undiagnosed COVID-19, Influenza, and RSV), DHS removed Vivian via ex parte order, placing her temporarily with a licensed relative (Gomez’s sister-in-law). This allowed near-daily parental visits, contrasting sharply with distant foster placements in other cases.

Court Proceedings and Victory

The juvenile court held extensive hearings from September 2022 through February 2023. Evidence included:

• Depositions from Dr. Abosaida, who emphasized CF’s progressive nature and the importance of standard therapies (e.g., Pulmozyme as the only effective option, concerns over vest compliance, and reluctance toward Orkambi).

• Testimony from other providers, including Vivian’s primary nurse practitioner (Sara Lee) and Dr. Callie Williams (who referred the family for a second opinion at University of Iowa’s CF clinic), affirming the parents’ proactive, loving care and lack of imminent danger.

• Pharmacy records, BMI trends (improving post-removal but within normal ranges at times), and family-centered services reports showing no observed concerns.

On February 15, 2023, the court granted the parents’ motion to dismiss removal, ordering immediate return. It found no substantial evidence justifying removal and no clear and convincing evidence that Vivian was a Child in Need of Assistance under Iowa Code § 232.96A(5) (unwilling/unable to provide medical treatment). The court noted:

• Reasonable efforts (assessments, services, relative placement) were made.

• Potential emotional harm from continued out-of-home placement outweighed risks.

• Parents were not unwilling to provide care; they questioned recommendations but pursued alternatives aligned with some CFF guidelines and sought second opinions.

The CINA petition was dismissed, relieving DHHS of supervision. (The State appealed; the Iowa Court of Appeals reversed in July 2023, but proceedings ultimately reaffirmed dismissal after further review, including Dr. Abosaida’s departure from the clinic.)

Polk County Iowa Final Judgement

230KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Parallels to Joy and Kenlee Zuraff

This Iowa outcome mirrors the Zuraff case in Florida, where Joy Zuraff’s daughter Kenlee (diagnosed with CF) was removed by DCF in March 2024 after disputes over treatments like Trikafta—a costly CFTR modulator requiring monthly liver monitoring. Zuraff questioned risks and protocols, leading to medical neglect allegations despite her efforts. As of early 2026, hearings continue, with potential termination of parental rights looming (next scheduled February 9, 2026). Advocacy sites like FreeKenlee.com and BrokenTruth.TV highlight similarities: reliance on specialist opinions, perceived non-compliance from questioning care, acute “failure to thrive” during illnesses misconstrued as neglect, and state intervention amid strained provider relationships.Both cases raise concerns about:

• Overreliance on one specialist’s view versus parental input or other providers.

• Conflicts in CF care (e.g., standard vs. alternative/holistic approaches).

• Emotional/financial toll on families managing a chronic, expensive disease (Trikafta exceeds $300,000/year, often Medicaid-funded).

Gomez’s success—bolstered by evidence, community support, and persistence—offers hope, though she credits advocates like Sonia Swan for attending appointments and navigating systems.

Vivian now receives care under improved clinic dynamics (post-Abosaida) and is on Trikafta, managing typical CF challenges. Gomez’s story, backed by the February 2023 ruling, underscores the importance of thorough evidence in challenging state actions while prioritizing child welfare in complex medical cases.

For more on similar situations, see BrokenTruth.TV and FreeKenlee.com coverage of the Zuraff family. These cases highlight the need for balanced systems that respect parental rights alongside expert medical guidance.

Dr. Furey dives deep into the explosive Free Kenlee case involving Joy Zuraff and her daughter Kenlee, a young girl battling cystic fibrosis. What began as a mother’s legitimate concerns over a medication with serious risks—like potential liver failure—spiraled into DCF action, an alleged diagnosis of Munchausen by proxy (or fictitious disorder imposed on another) made without ever speaking to the mother, and Kenlee’s removal from her family.

Dr. Furey doesn’t hold back on the red flags: “You cannot definitively diagnose someone if you’ve never evaluated them. That’s unethical.”

She stresses that a proper evaluation demands direct assessment of both the child and the caregiver—reviewing discrepancies between reported and observed symptoms, understanding the family’s perspective, and ruling out genuine medical realities (like Kenlee’s confirmed CF diagnosis, which can’t be fabricated). Diagnosing without that personal contact? Dr. Furey calls it a serious ethical breach, one that could warrant professional sanctions.

The conversation uncovers more troubling layers: a nurse practitioner’s diagnosis used in court without patient interaction, the replacement of Judge Steven Warrick with Judge J. Scott Duncan (who then issued a gag order silencing Joy’s ability to share her story publicly), and heartbreaking video from the removal highlighting how treatment disagreements escalated dramatically.

Dr. Furey questions whether this justifies termination of parental rights proceedings—describing TPR as an extreme step reserved for documented, prolonged abuse with every effort at reunification—not what appears here. She also warns of the profound psychological harm to children torn from parents: abandonment, eroded trust, confusion, and long-term attachment struggles.

Is this child protection... or an overreach that dismisses parental rights, informed consent, and ethical standards in medicine?

Watch the full episode on BrokenTruth.TV to hear Dr. Furey’s expert breakdown, the raw details, and why this case is igniting nationwide debate. Check FreeKenlee.com for public case information and updates.

Donate to help Free Kenlee

This is the kind of hard-hitting discussion that demands attention—tune in now, subscribe, and hit notifications. When a parent’s concern for their child’s health gets twisted into “abuse,” what does that say about the system? Find out for yourself.